Comments on Mika's Critique of Hartnett, Nelson, and Rinn's Article, "Gifted or ADHD? The Possibilities of Misdiagnosis."
Tipo de recurso
Autores/contribuidores
- Goerss, Jean (Author)
- Amend, Edward R. (Author)
- Webb, James T. (Author)
- Webb, Nadia (Author)
- Beljan, Paul (Author)
Title
Comments on Mika's Critique of Hartnett, Nelson, and Rinn's Article, "Gifted or ADHD? The Possibilities of Misdiagnosis."
Abstract
The Hartnett, Nelson, and Rinn 2004 study (see record 2004-11177-002) indicates that diagnostic confusion between ADD/ADHD and giftedness exists, and that research on medication practices is warranted. Mika (see reocrd 2006-11964-007) disagrees, saying that there is no empirical evidence of misdiagnosis of gifted children as having ADD/ADHD. We disagree with Mika's logic, and describe evidence that suggests that such misdiagnosis does occur, with possible concurrent risks. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
(Source: journal abstract)
Publication
Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education
Publisher
Roeper School Taylor & Francis
Date
Jul 2006 - Sep 2006
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
249-251
ISSN
0278-3193, 0278-3193
Archive
APA PsycInfo®
Loc. in Archive
621435213; 2006-11964-009
Language
en-US
Extra
titleTranslation: Comentarios sobre la crítica de Mika al artículo de Hartnett, Nelson y Rinn, "¿Superdotado o TDAH? Las posibilidades de un diagnóstico erróneo".
abstractTranslation: El estudio de Hartnett, Nelson y Rinn 2004 (ver registro 2004-11177-002) indica que existe confusión diagnóstica entre el TDA/TDAH y la superdotación, y que se justifica la investigación sobre las prácticas de medicación. Mika (ver reocrd 2006-11964-007) no está de acuerdo, diciendo que no hay evidencia empírica de un diagnóstico erróneo de niños superdotados con TDA/TDAH. No estamos de acuerdo con la lógica de Mika y describimos la evidencia que sugiere que tal diagnóstico erróneo ocurre, con posibles riesgos concurrentes. (Registro de la base de datos PsycINFO (c) 2016 APA, todos los derechos reservados) (Fuente: resumen de la revista)
Enlaces
Notas
Última actualización - 2017-09-26
Fecha de revisión - 20070319
SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity 10010P4C 2818P4C 5904P4C 6491P4C 815P4C 816P4C 2799P4B 5866P4B 6447P4B 808P4B 809P4B 9945P4B; Diagnosis 10010P4C 2674P4C 2658P4B 9945P4B; Gifted 10010P4C 1840P4C 1870P4C 4139P4C 5027P4C 1828P4B 1858P4B 4114P4B 4996P4B 9945P4B; Misdiagnosis 10010P4C 2674P4C 6121P4C 2658P4B 6079P4B 9945P4B
Número de referencias - 8
Citación
Goerss, J., Amend, E. R., Webb, J. T., Webb, N., & Beljan, P. (2006). Comments on Mika’s Critique of Hartnett, Nelson, and Rinn’s Article, “Gifted or ADHD? The Possibilities of Misdiagnosis.” Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education, 28(4), 249–251. APA PsycInfo® (621435213; 2006-11964-009). https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190609554372
Enlace a este registro