Su búsqueda

This research intends to provide empirical support for the possibility of misdiagnosis of giftedness and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Forty-four graduate students enrolled in a school counseling program acted as participants. Participants were given one of two forms, both of which provided a hypothetical case study of a young boy with characteristics of both giftedness and ADHD. Participants were then asked for a diagnosis. A chi-square analysis suggests a statistically significant difference whereby the suggestion of the diagnosis of giftedness can lead participants away from a diagnosis of ADHD. Implications for educators and graduate level counseling and psychology programs are provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Comments on Sternberg's article on WICS as a model for giftedness (see record 2004-10570-002). The current authors focus on how to avoid selecting the "Denny's" of the world, referring to to a former gifted student who seemed primed for success-but then committed suicide. They argue that gifted education programmes, and especially those for younger students, should focus on finding all students of high ability and helping them develop their talents. In doing so we also hope the number of Denny's in the world might be reduced-not by excluding them from gifted programmes, but by including them and better preparing them to deal both with the positive and negative consequences of giftedness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Six hundred and thirty-nine Chinese primary and secondary gifted students were assessed on their adjustment problems using the revised Student Adjustment Problems Inventory (SAPI-24). Students' responses indicated that intense involvement, perfectionism, unchallenging schoolwork, multipotentiality, and parental expectations could be relatively common problems among gifted students. Less salient was the problem of poor interpersonal relationships. While the notion linking giftedness and vulnerability to adjustment problems was not borne out by the data with traditional IQ measure, specific adjustment problems were found to be associated with specific intelligences, which conferred both increased and reduced vulnerability dependent on the adjustment problems involved. Implications of the findings for future research into the complex relationships between adjustment problems and giftedness or multiple intelligences are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Compared the social status of 42 highly gifted and 86 moderately gifted students (aged 12–16 yrs) across academic (classroom) and social (dormitory) settings. Giftedness was not significantly related to social status in either setting. Two social statuses, popular and rejected, were significantly stable across settings. Furthermore these statuses were related to peer nominations for getting along, fighting, and being shy, to social and academic measures of self-concept, and to age relative to the peer group. These findings are examined in light of other research on giftedness and social status. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)

This article presents an analysis of patterns of giftedness based on the triarchic theory of intelligence. The analysis distinguishes among seven different patterns of giftedness, each involving a different combination of analytical, creative, and practical abilities. The seven patterns are the Analyzer, the Creator, the Practitioner, the Analytical Creator the Analytical Practitioner, the Creative Practitioner, and the Consummate Balancer. Examples are given of each pattern and the strengths and weaknesses of each pattern are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

Recent articles on the gifted self are characterized by theoretical confusion and lack of definitional clarity. This article, anchored in current self psychology theory, defines the self experience as the person's subjective experience of organization and meaning, the maintenance of which is crucial to normal functioning. Interactions with others are a formative part of the self experience. It is argued that traits of giftedness, and the reactions of others to these, contribute to the gifted self experience. The author contends that social and emotional problems of giftedness, such as those that arise with asynchronous development and perfectionism, are based on a compromised sense of cohesion and unity of the self experience. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)

Gifted children and their families may be considered a population with unique needs. In this column, the characteristics of gifted children and the impact of giftedness on the family are presented. Family therapists are encouraged to examine their own attitudes toward giftedness and to enhance their sensitivity in working with gifted families. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

The Gifted Rating Scales-School Form (GRS-S), a teacher-completed rating scale, is designed to identify five types of giftedness and motivation. This study examines the reliability and validity of a Chinese-translated version of the GRS-S with a sample of Chinese elementary and middle school students (N=499). The Chinese GRSS was found to have high internal consistency. Results of the confirmatory factor analysis corroborated the six-factor solution of the original GRS-S. Comparison of the GRS-S scores and measures of academic performance provide preliminary support for the criterion validity of the Chinese-translated GRS-S. Significant age and gender differences on the Chinese GRS-S were found. Results provide preliminary support for the Chinese version of the GRS-S as a reliable and valid measure of giftedness for Chinese students. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Following an introductory definition of 'scientific ability and creativity', product-oriented, personality and social psychological approaches to studying scientific ability are examined with reference to competence and performance. Studies in the psychometric versus cognitive psychological paradigms are dealt with in more detail. These two research strategies complement each other in describing and explaining scientific ability and creativity in the field of science and technology. Whereas psychometric studies seem to be essential for diagnostic and prognostic purposes, cognitive psychological studies help to explain the development of individual competencies and excellent performances. In the last two decades, another research paradigm has arisen that has been characterized as 'giftedness as developing expertise'. The so-called 'expert-novice paradigm' is based on a dynamic concept of giftedness in which creativity and motivation play an indispensable role. As an example of this approach, the Munich Dynamic Ability Achievement Model (MDAAM)--an extended version of the Munich Model of Giftedness (MMG)--will be discussed in greater detail. Furthermore, empirical data from the author's studies of scientific ability and technical creativity will be presented and their theoretical context described. Finally, various possibilities for nurturing scientifically and creatively talented adolescents and adults are discussed, with sex-related problems being touched upon. Generally, the hypothetical construct 'scientific ability' can be defined as scientific thinking potential or as a special talent for excellence in (natural) sciences. Similar to this definition, 'scientific creativity' or 'technical creativity' can be conceptualized as individual and social capacities for solving complex scientific and technical problems in an innovative and productive way. Both descriptive and explanatory terms are necessary for a theoretically and practically efficient definition. This further necessitates different research strategies, which will be demonstrated with respect to several study examples. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

This paper describes a developmental psychological approach to understanding giftedness. A theoretical model of exceptional expertise is used to frame our understanding of how gifted children's conceptual knowledge develops in a variety of domains and how the interplay of this conceptual knowledge with domain-specific skills results in rich, elaborate thinking. This model provides a 'design for development' of giftedness in a variety of domains. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Counseling concerns of highly able students may reflect characteristics associated with giftedness. Yet school counselor training programs give scant attention to this phenomenon and to the social and emotional development of these students. School counselors therefore may be unaware of and unequipped to respond to these concerns. Referencing scholarly literature related to giftedness as both asset and burden, the author explores school counselors' potential roles in responding to the needs of gifted students. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

The article describes Israel's approach to the education of gifted and talented children. It describes the programs for gifted and talented children in Israel and the process for selecting students for these programs. The method of selecting students for programs is consistent with the Ministry of Education's definition of giftedness, the goals of the giftedness programs, and the characteristics of these programs. The selection method is affected by the standards required of the instruments as well as other constraints, such as the constraints on funding for this purpose. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

A considerable amount of recent evidence suggests that speed of information processing (SIP) may be related to general giftedness as well as contributing to higher mathematical ability. To date, no study has examined SIP associated with both general giftedness (G) and excellence in mathematics (EM). This paper presents a part of more extensive research aimed at a multidimensional examination of mathematical giftedness, which is a complex function of the G factor and EM factor. The research population consisted of four groups of 10th–11th grade students who differed in their G level and EM level. 190 participants performed five SIP tests: Visual-matching, Cross-out of numbers, Digit-symbol, Symbol-search and Simple arithmetic exercises. We found that the G–EM group outperformed the three other study groups on all five tests. The findings reveal that between-group differences in performance on Cross-out of numbers and Simple arithmetic exercises tests are associated with both G and EM factors, whereas especially the G factor had an effect on students’ scores on Digit-symbol, Symbol-search and Visual-matching tests. In addition, we found gender differences on the Digit-symbol and Symbol-search tests. The results of this study suggest that EM and G factors are interrelated but represent different traits with respect to the SIP. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

One hundred twenty-four undergraduate education majors completed the phrase "a gifted student is ______" using a metaphor and then explained their choice of metaphor. Qualitative metaphor analysis influenced by Dai's (2009) essential tensions determined that preservice teachers conceive of giftedness as rapid memorization of content knowledge and showy demonstrations of achievement. They believe that excellence is rare and that intelligence is generalizable. Responses were mixed as to whether giftedness is a natural state of being or a process of becoming gifted. There was very little evidence to suggest that preservice teachers focused on the motivational aspect of talent development or the notion that gifted students are likely popular with their peers. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

This issue sets itself apart from earlier issues through its lack of traditional giftedness research articles. This is not simply a coincidence. The work on display here is becoming generally more prevalent, and I see at least two developments in our field that help explain this shift. The issue's first contribution raises fundamental questions about giftedness research and the nature and quality of the relationship between the field and its various parent disciplines. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

Unlike traditional person-centered models of giftedness, the Actiotope Model of Giftedness focuses on the person-environment interactions. It postulates that successful learning requires necessary resources, termed educational and learning capital, located both in the environment and the individual. The Questionnaire of Educational and Learning Capital (QELC) is introduced. The results of a validation study with students from China, Turkey and Germany is reported which shows that the QELC has satisfactory psychometric properties as well as construct and concurrent validity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

This commentary addresses Subotnik et al.’s (see record 2012-24309-002) target article from the perspective of researchers active in the field of giftedness. First, we self-critically examine the current standing of giftedness research within the scientific community. Second, the authors’ critique of gifted education is sharpened in three respects: (a) gifted identification, (b) effectiveness of gifted education, and (c) credentials of gifted education. Finally, four necessary and productive lines for future research are proposed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

There has been an increase in publications of quantitative research studies investigating overexcitabilities (OEs) and giftedness. On one hand, increased interest in OEs bodes well for the dissemination of Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration (TPD), from which OEs are derived. On the other hand, recent research raises concerns regarding the assumptions underlying the research methods in common use. This article argues that the assumptions regarding OEs and their relationship to giftedness evident in recent research run counter to Dabrowskian theorizing. Due to the uniqueness and coherence of TPD, the article concludes by noting the need for a paradigm shift when researchers investigate TPD concepts such as OE. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Comments on an article by Albert Zieglera & Shane N. Phillipson (see record 2012-16824-002). In the study, we tried to find out what made a person demonstrate outstanding scientific creativity. The result showed that eminent scientists had a variety of essential traits, such as intrinsic motivation, eruditeness, autonomy, and initiative. However, we also know that these traits are also possessed by many ordinary people to some extent. So these traits are necessary but not sufficient for preeminence. More importantly, along the pathway the interaction and the co-evolution are the keys to transcendence. It is lucky that we have a chance to read Ziegler and Phillipson’s systemic theory of gifted education,which can shed more light on our findings. Here, we will first comment on the theory that inspires us, then reinterpret our findings in the light of it, and put forward some tentative suggestions in the end. In contrast to traditional trait-oriented conceptions, Ziegler and Phillipson redefine excellence from the perspective of an action-oriented approach. In the Actiotope Model of Giftedness, which has been elegantly crafted over the years,excellence refers to a specific quality of actions. In this way, Ziegler and Phillipson greatly expand the understanding of giftedness. The model provides a comprehensive new vision for gifted education, and can help researchers understand giftedness more profoundly and broadly. What we are looking forward to is its widespread application in gifted education in China. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

This issue of High Ability Studies stands out with regard to diversity in two respects. First, it includes contributions from various areas of talent development and expertise, some of which have been studied very little to date. It features studies focusing on, for instance, expertise in poker, the musically gifted, talented dancers and academic giftedness. Second, highly diverse aspects of talent development, giftedness, and expertise such as decision making, cooperative learning, competition perfectionism, and ability climates are examined. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)