Su búsqueda

Gifted children may need assistance developing a positive self-concept if they are to reach their full potential. Parents play a role in shaping and influencing the attitudes and values of their children. Having a gifted child may affect the self-perceptions of the parents and the child. This study examined the relationships between specific self-perceptions of gifted children and their parents. This study included 71 families (subjects = 211), with follow-up interviews of five families (subjects = 16). The students were between 9 and 11 years old, identified as gifted, and lived with both parents. Parents and children completed a demographic information form and a questionnaire about the characteristics of giftedness. Children also completed the Self-Perception Profile for Children (Harter, 1985), and parents completed the Adult Self-Perception Profile (Messer & Harter, 1986). For the purposes of this study, a parent was classified as gifted if she or he met certain criteria. Students reported higher self-concepts than the norming samples on the scholastic, social, behavioral, and global dimensions. Mothers and fathers tended to rate themselves lower than the norming samples. Females rated themselves lower on the athletic subscale than males, and higher on the behavioral conduct subscale. Mothers and fathers classified as gifted rated themselves higher than did nongifted parents. Because the range of self-perception scores was negatively skewed, few correlations between groups were found. Characteristics of giftedness data were collected in the areas of advanced cognitive development, persistence and motivation, standards of excellence, perspective, mental processing ability, and social and emotional qualities. The rate of agreement between parents and their children was calculated. Gifted parents had higher rates of agreement with their children than did nongifted parents. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

The purpose of this study was to examine the educational narratives of undergraduate college students in order to understand how giftedness interacts with learning disabilities in the construction of identity. There were three goals of the study: to allow a forum for college students to tell their stories of what it means to be gifted with learning disabilities, to collaborate with constituents in the construction of knowledge, and to create awareness of the special needs of this population. Our knowledge is extremely limited regarding the educational experiences of students with giftedness and learning disabilities and there has been no research on how these dual exceptionalities affect identity formation. Qualitative narrative inquiry was chosen as the methodology for the study. The following questions guided the study: (1) What themes emerge in the educational narratives of the participants in the study? (2) How does the sociocultural context affect the participants' meanings of learning disabilities? (3) How does the sociocultural context affect the participants' meanings of giftedness? (4) How do these meanings affect identity formation? The overall theoretical framework which provided guidance for this study was the sociocultural construction of identity. Two approaches within this framework that had relevancy for the study were the biographical-historical approach and sociocultural ambivalence. A diverse group of four participants were purposefully selected with regards to gender, race, and gifts and talents. The primary sources of data were the stories of the participants. Two types of analyses were used, narrative analysis and analysis of narratives. Narrative analysis resulted in the generation of stories jointly constructed by the participants and the researcher. Analysis of narrative resulted in the description of themes. Two contextual themes emerged in the narratives as being integral to identity formation of the participants: support systems in the way of family, teachers, mentors, and friends; and extra-curricular activities. The life stories suggested four personal themes in identity formation: self-knowledge, self-acceptance, self-advocacy, and self-determination. Educational and psychological implications are discussed and recommendations suggested for further research. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

Multipotentiality and giftedness have been consistently associated with one another in the career counseling literature. Because gifted students generally have diverse interests across numerous domains and may be capable of success in many endeavors or professions, they are confronted with unique decisions as a result of these choices. When encountering multiple opportunities, some students may experience confusion, anxiety and frustration because they fear missing something or making a wrong decision. For other students, similar situations offer opportunities for exploration, productivity, and self-actualization. Most of the knowledge surrounding the construct of multipotentiality is based on assumptions and conflicting empirical research studies that have either supported its existence or dismissed it as minimal or non-existent. In this study, university honors students completed a survey dealing with multipotentiality entitled the Attitudes Toward Life Choices Survey (ATLC). A confirmatory factor analysis supported a four-factor model for the ATLC, which identified healthy or unhealthy attitudes of honors students toward the numerous choices that they face. As described by self-reported high aptitude and interests across a wide variety of areas, 84% of the respondents demonstrated multipotentiality. Within this group, a continuum existed, as approximately 10% of the population exhibited unhealthy attitudes toward life choices, described as having difficulty with decision-making and career planning, and 20% of the respondents had healthy attitudes regarding multipotentiality and were able to both select areas of interest and identify directions for careers. Descriptive statistics and qualitative data collected from interviews with 12 purposively selected participants revealed further differences among these two groups such as: major-switching, goal-orientation, romance with a field, and the ability to focus on a career plan. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

Implicit conceptions of giftedness in four parents of intellectually gifted children from different families were examined in this dissertation. Each parent's ideas were explored in case studies based on in-depth interviews. Despite the individuality of their conceptions, the parents shared some commonalities in their beliefs about giftedness. The differences in their ideas reflected not only their unique life experiences, but also the varied stages of their conceptions. The parents came from diverse backgrounds. Each family had two or three children whose ages ranged from three to nineteen years old. The participants' childhood experiences, their education, their value structures, their roles as parents, as well as their learning about, and observation of gifted children, contributed to their conceptions of giftedness. The study examined the impact of these influences on the development of their conceptions. The parents' conceptions affected their perceptions of giftedness in their children. Preliminary evidence suggested that their perceptions influenced the parents' behavior toward, and decision-making about, their children. The naturalistic case study approach revealed the contextual, "real-life" nature of the parents' conceptions. The parents thought of giftedness as a "whole concept" that described the "whole child." Rather than focusing solely on their children's intellects, the parents also viewed their children's giftedness in social, emotional, humanistic, moral, and spiritual terms. Parents conceptualized multiple types of giftedness that acknowledged their children's diverse talents and qualities. None of the parents believed that giftedness was synonymous with intelligence. Nor did they believe that giftedness could be measured solely by an IQ test. Giftedness, they concluded, was more than the sum of its parts. The cross-case analysis pointed to different stages of conceptions among the parents in terms of their learning processes about giftedness, the flux of their conceptions, and the amount of internal dissonance about the concept itself and how it affected their children's lives. Their attitudes about giftedness, however, remained independent of their stage of conception. Study findings suggested new directions for researchers who formulate conceptions of giftedness. Specific considerations in the education and counseling of gifted children's parents were provided as examples of practical applications of the results. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

This dissertation explored gender differences in motivation, achievement choices, and mental health among gifted and non-gifted adolescents in the 1990s. Data were from a longitudinal survey study of motivation, activity choice, mental health, and peer and family relationships among 1179 European American children. The first study hypothesized that there would be few or no gender differences in math and science motivation and achievement choices among high school students in the 1990s because of increased efforts to encourage young women to enter technology, physics, and applied mathematics fields in recent decades. Overall, giftedness was a stronger determinant of attitudes and behaviors than gender. Growth curve hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) with an accelerated longitudinal design of three cohorts from first through twelfthgrades showed that math expectancies and values declined over time for all students, with the exception of gifted girls whose math expectancies increased. There were no gender differences in math, but there were gender differences favoring males in science expectancies and values in both ability groups. Cross-sectional analyses in high school showed that non-gifted girls took AP calculus less frequently than non-gifted boys, and gifted girls took AP physics less frequently than gifted boys. Girls in both ability groups had higher educational aspirations and expectations than boys, and gifted girls planned to go into math and physical science jobs more frequently than gifted boys. It is suggested that educators now need to focus on girls in science, and physics in particular. The second study hypothesized that gifted girls would experience more psychologic conflict over career vs. family and more academic anxiety and depression than their peers. Growth curve analysis with HLM showed that it was non-gifted girls, rather than gifted girls, who experienced the most psychological distress on all mental health indicators from seventh through twelfth grades. Furthermore, gifted girls' mental health was positively, not negatively, affected by their desire to have children. In sum, across both studies, it was non-gifted girls who had the lowest motivation and mental health. In addition to implications of these findings, the nature of giftedness in this sample is also discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

A meta-analytic review of ten articles of the metacognition of gifted children was conducted. The study used comparison groups of gifted and non-gifted children. Additional analysis was done to investigate moderating variables. Results indicated that there was a relationship between being gifted and metacognition. However, when the analysis for heterogeneity was done, it came out significant. This meant that it was not homogeneous, and that differences existed that were not due to sampling error alone. Additional analysis were done to explore if the moderating variables were responsible for the heterogeneity, however, the models failed. The overall findings of this meta-analysis indicated that there is a relationship between being gifted and metacognition. However, since the analysis for heterogeneity was significant, results should be interpreted with caution. Further extensive research is needed and several suggestions were given. They included improved criteria for the determination of giftedness, clarification of the different aspects of metacognition, improved measures, and more research involving mixed ethnicities. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

This study has the objective of examining parental perceptions, some home environmental factors, and SES on a child's cognitive development. Two groups were used to collect data, a high SES group and a low SES group. Twenty-six preschool children, 13 females and 13 males (24 Caucasian, one African American, and one Asian) were referred for giftedness. Parents responded to two surveys, one questionnaire, and an interview. The children were administered two cognitive skills tests: (a) The Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (Kaufman & Kaufman, 1983), KABC and (b) the Qualitative Use of English and Spanish Tasks, QUEST, (Gonzalez, 1991). Qualitative analyses was used to: (a) describe parental perceptions about the meaning of giftedness; and (b) describe parental perceptions about the development of giftedness. A total of seven patterns were found. Quantitative analyses was used to: (a) explore any relationship between parental perceptions and their own child's cognitive abilities; (b) explore any relationship between some environmental factors and the child's cognitive abilities; and (c) explore any relationship between the parents socioeconomic status and their own child's cognitive abilities. Quantitative results suggest that some home environmental factors do influence a child's cognitive abilities. Quantitative results also suggest that the parents' SES influences the child's performance on cognitive skills tests. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

Giftedness is precious to mankind. It is vital that optimal development of the highly gifted should be assured. Psychosocial development can either promote or inhibit the full utilisation of individual abilities. The objective of this research project is to describe some aspects of friendships of intellectually highly gifted adolescents. Friendship is important, especially during adolescence. Understanding of and support derived from friendship is essential. Friendship has unique value for psychosocial development. Early healthy relationships are regarded as one of the best predictors of adjustment in adulthood. The highly gifted are categorised as a subgroup of the gifted. The majority are psychosocially well adjusted. Friendships develop through mutual interaction within the context of the family, school and peer group. The main task of the gifted is to find acceptance in a confirming adolescent culture. Their true peer group are equals in age, abilities and interests. Hypotheses arising from literature are set in accordance to three themes whereby the investigation was conducted. Six case studies of intellectually highly gifted matriculants were performed. Qualitative data collection and analysis were done by means of observation and questionnaires which served as a basis for unstructured interviewing. Theme 1. "Adolescents form friendships in essentially the following environments: family, school, neighbourhood and organisations". This investigation confirms the theme. The psychosocial well-being of the majority of intellectually highly gifted adolescents is confirmed by the available literature, although some may experience problems. Theme 2. "Friendships of the highly gifted are characterised by a few friends, older friends, friends with equal abilities and interests. Friends in their own age group is essential". According to this study they have enough friends. Theme 3. "The social task to fit in lies at the core of serious maladjustment among gifted adolescents. Sometimes they feel different". The group under investigation are accepted in their smaller social circles, but not always in the larger adolescent group. A tendency of being different is present. Adults are responsible for social contact and interaction. Given the importance of friendships, the field of research regarding peer group relationships of intellectually highly gifted adolescents has remained relatively unexplored. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

The research examined social and emotional adjustment of highly gifted adults. Precursors to emotional and moral reasoning development, and examples of self-actualization, were examined through a case study analysis of 41 highly gifted men and women between the ages of 40 and 60. Their IQs were estimated in the 140 to 190 range. Author-designed written questionnaires probed educational, social, and family experiences during childhood, early and middle adult years. Subjects participated via a two-stage mail survey. Findings built upon work on high giftedness of Terman, Hollingworth, Gross; talent development by Cox, Goertzel and Goertzel, and Bloom; cognitive development by Kohlberg, Rest, and Gilligan; emotional development by Maslow, Dabrowski, and Piechowski; and generational cohort effects by Strauss and Howe. The study examined (a) subjects' self-perceptions drawn from their experiences with family and school, (b) negative feedback from others, grades, issues with authority, study habits, and difficulties "fitting in" socially, and (c) career success, living up to one's potential, and adult satisfaction. Subject responses were categorized in terms of a developmental framework ranging from self-interest and self-preservation, through stereotypic roles and personality transformation, to self- actualization. The study touched on relationships between abuse, intellectual level, the Defining Issues Test ( DIT) on moral reasoning, religion, spirituality, suicide, gender, marriage, and family composition for high IQ adults. The primary findings were: (1) Participants uniformly wished they had received more feedback during childhood about their potential and abilities and more input in determining life choices. (2) Regardless of childhood experiences, some subjects chose their life's course early and have not changed; other subjects with similar experiences underwent intensive personal, and sometimes career, changes. (3) The DIT, although not designed for this purpose, distinguished between two types of subjects, those who had early identity formation without subsequent changes, and those who had made changes in their lives. The former group scored lower on the DIT. (4) Abuse and lack of support handicapped some people, but provided an impetus for change in others. Most subjects who were abused but attained higher emotional development levels named individuals who made them feel they could succeed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

The purpose of this study was to describe the relationships between the intelligence, creativity, motivation, and gender role identity and the academic achievement of gifted fifth grade students. The study was based on Renzulli's triad model of giftedness (Renzulli, 1978). That model defines giftedness as the integration of three clusters: high intelligence, creative ability, and high levels of task commitment (motivation). The model argues that it is the interaction among these three clusters that is necessary for outstanding performance. The study used a correlational research design and a sample of 71 gifted fifth grade students to estimate the individual and collective relationships between the intelligence, creativity, motivation, and gender role identity (masculinity and femininity) and the academic achievement. Analyses using the Pearson product-moment correlation technique and multiple linear regression procedures yielded the following results: (1) intelligence was a significant predictor of mathematics and reading achievement; (2) motivation was a significant predictor of mathematics and reading achievement; (3) creativity was not a significant predictor of mathematics and reading achievement; (4) masculinity was a significant predictor of mathematics achievement but was not a significant predictor of reading achievement; (5) femininity was not a significant predictor of mathematics or reading achievement; (6) when examined in combination, only motivation was a significant predictor of mathematics achievement; and (7) when examined in combination, only intelligence and motivation were significant predictors of reading achievement. The results of this study seem to support Renzulli's contention that intelligence and motivation are key factors in the academic performance of gifted children but do not support his argument that creativity is a key factor in the academic performance of gifted children. The results also suggest that gender role identity is not a key factor in the academic performance of gifted children. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

The purpose of this clinical case study was the assessment and treatment of an emotionally disturbed, intellectually gifted adolescent. The case study subject was a fourteen-year-old Caucasian female in residential treatment. A combination of cognitive behavioral and brief therapy techniques was utilized. The assessment process examined various areas of development and determined areas of developmental advancement as well as developmental arrest. After a thorough psychodiagnostic assessment the adolescent was diagnosed with (1) Major Depression, moderate, recurrent, (2) Conduct Disorder, and (3) Alcohol Dependence. In addition to the above diagnoses, the specific strengths and weaknesses of the gifted individual were assessed in order to adequately integrate them into the treatment process. Specific therapeutic goals included (1) Decreasing depressive symptoms, (2) Achieving an understanding of the escalation of her anger and what constitutes appropriate expression of anger, (3) Achieving an understanding of the past and present sources of low self-esteem and increasing self-esteem as measured by subjective report and by overt behavior. The above specified goals were targeted during treatment, with special attention given to educating the subject about the ways in which giftedness impacted her presenting problems. The next step in treatment was a collaborative identification of her self-critical thought patterns with an emphasis on building cognitive strategies to refute these patterns. Treatment continued with the implementation of these strategies, and finally, treatment concluded with a termination phase. Progress throughout the course of therapy was assessed through reference to movement along the phase and grade system in the residential treatment center where the subject was a patient. The subject's performance on thought records was also assessed. The duration of time between a dysfunctional behavior occurring and the subject's identification of the dysfunctional thoughts that motivated her behavior was determined from self-report and observation in therapy sessions. In addition, the subject was assessed on the Beck Depression Inventory seven times over the course of treatment. Overall, the subject was successful in attaining most of her therapeutic goals. During the course of treatment, her ability to identify irrational beliefs and automatic thoughts which motivated her dysfunctional behaviors increased. This increase was evidenced by her participation in therapy and the completion of cognitive homework assignments. In addition, the subject's phase and grades improved and her Beck Depression Inventory scores decreased. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

Most research conducted on counseling the gifted is anecdotal in nature focusing on the experiences of a single counselor. To gain a broader perspective of the topic, this study investigated the effective and ineffective behaviors of school guidance counselors throughout the United States in their interactions with gifted students. The Critical Incident Technique (CIT), as described by John Flanagan (1954), was the main investigative tool of this qualitative study. The steps of this study were (a) review pertinent literature, (b) conduct a pilot study, (c) define the general aim of counseling the gifted, (d) distribute critical incident questionnaires, (e) conduct group CIT interviews with school guidance, (f) analyze the collected critical incidents, and (g) synthesize a model for counseling the gifted. Over 300 critical incidents were sorted into 75 categories and then collapsed into four general areas: educational issues, career issues, social issues, and understanding giftedness. In each area, certain counselor behaviors emerged to meet the general aim of counseling the gifted. In educational issues, the counselor (a) provided appropriate assessment and placement of gifted students and (b) instigated appropriate curricular modifications. In career issues, the counselor guided appropriate career exposure and career path experiences. In social issues, the counselor guided the student in interpersonal relations and guided the student's personal growth. In understanding giftedness, the counselor helped the student understand giftedness in themselves, in the family, and within groups. School guidance counselors reported being effective when they interacted with students in ways consistent with the tenets of gifted education. They were effective when they varied the pace, depth, novelty, or sophistication of their interactions in a manner that matched the student's developmental level and were not bound by traditional ideas of grade or age level. Gifted students seek the help of the school guidance counselor for many issues: issues that all students face, issues that were intensified by their giftedness, and issues that were unique to the gifted. Yet, school guidance counselors reported that they felt ill prepared to meet the needs of the gifted. The effectiveness of the school guidance counselor can be increased by specific training in the characteristics and needs of the gifted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

Self-esteem has been shown to be positively related to both academic success and success in the adult world. Given the importance of self-esteem, the role of the education system in the development of positive self-esteem is of great concern. Specifically, some researchers have raised questions about the impact of identifying students as "Gifted" or "Learning Disabled" on students' self-esteem. This study explores the impact of giftedness and learning disabilities on the self-esteem of children. In particular, this study focuses on the presence or absence of differences in self-esteem between students identified as gifted and not, as well as students identified as having learning disabilities and not. The existence of differences in self-esteem related to the interaction between gifted and learning disability identification is also investigated. Students labeled as gifted had higher self-esteem scores than their non-gifted peers. This is similar to results found by other researchers. There was also a significant interaction between labeling as gifted and labeling as learning disabled. The school self-esteem scores of the students in this study varied as a function of both their identification as gifted and their identification as learning disabled. Gifted students had the highest school self-esteem, followed by students with learning disabilities. Students identified as both gifted and as having learning disabilities scored third highest, and students identified as neither gifted nor learning disabled had the lowest school self-esteem. Gifted students with learning disabilities identified two categories of self-esteem supports. The first category focuses on their strengths and these students' ability to do some things well. The second category focuses on an understanding of their weaknesses, appropriate attribution of success and failure, and strategies they can use to overcome their disabilities. The results point to a number of areas where school districts can act to support the self-esteem of these students. These include identification of gifted learning disabled students, teachers who understand that students can be both gifted and learning disabled, curricula which include activities that allow students to display their support services so that students may obtain the guidance and support they need to excel. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the learning environment on the emergence of gifted potential in preschool children. The primary research question focused on the nature of the learning environment that facilitates the emergence of these early indicators. Two preschool learning environments were examined: the traditional classroom and the constructivist classroom. In order to develop a more comprehensive response to the primary question, two subquestions were investigated which related to the nature and the observable developmental pattern of early signs of giftedness. Subjects included 21 three and four-year old children who participated in each of the two types of classrooms for a total of 12 weeks. Activities in the traditional classroom were more teacher-directed and highly structured, while those in the constructivist classroom were more child-directed and allowed for more independent learning. Nonparticipant observers noted the behaviors of each child who was involved in the classroom activities. The Brigance Preschool Screen and the Thinking Creatively in Action and Movement creativity measure were administered to each child for later assistance in discussing results. Recorded data were organized into levels of high, medium, and low under four broad categories: (a) cognitive development, (b) socioemotional development, (c) creativity, and (d) motivation. Results indicated that the constructivist classroom appeared to evoke a higher level of development in all four areas from the class as a whole. Individual subjects, however, exhibited a wide variety of behavioral profiles within these four areas. Test data yielded results similar to the evaluation of observed behaviors in terms of cognitive ability or readiness as measured by the Brigance Preschool Screen. Results from the TCAM, however, were not necessarily distributed in the same way as the behavioral evaluations. Findings from this study contribute to the ideas in the literature that behavioral identification is an effective way to evoke and observe the emergence of gifted potential. Although the study should be replicated with a larger group of similar students and/or a group of children with more diverse backgrounds and socioeconomic situations, findings from this study provide important implications for preschool teacher training, underachievement prevention, and programming for potentially gifted children. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

Resilience has recently become part of a shift in perspective in the psychology and education of children from high-risk environments. Many researchers point to the phenomenon of the resilient child and discuss the importance of identifying positive factors that lead to capacity and strength despite environmental traumas. Although there has always been much attention paid by the mental health field, as well as the media, education, and legal systems, to individuals who failed in life due to stressors, especially multiple stressors, in their environments, there has been limited research in identifying factors that promote certain individuals to succeed despite the odds. The purpose of this study was to explore and explain, through a case-study profile approach, the experiences of three self-determined, academically gifted, resilient individuals who overcame their stressed and negative environments to succeed in extraordinary ways. A particular focus of the study was to identify and isolate academic giftedness as a protective factor that has promoted resilience in such individuals and to highlight the importance of identifying academically gifted children who emerge from such environments, especially those that include economic disadvantage. The research undertaken for this project was of a qualitative nature, based upon the premise of emergent design. The investigation utilized an in-depth interview approach, and each case profile was developed in terms of family background, educational background and signs of giftedness, career success, environmental stressors, and protective factors. Conclusions of this study are that, especially to gifted individuals coming from multiple-stressor environments, school becomes a refuge and school success a necessary and self-validating experience. It is especially crucial to identify gifted children early when they come from such environments since that identification may be their single source of salvation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

The effect of the mother's use of the term "gifted" was examined. Mothers who used gifted ("Users", n = 27), mothers who avoided using gifted ("Avoiders", n = 21), and their school aged children whom they identified as gifted were compared with mothers ("Comparison", n = 20) and their non-identified children using a structured interview and questionnaires. Mothers of gifted children believed giftedness ran in families and caused social problems. User mothers valued intelligence highly, placed less emphasis on hard work, were less satisfied with their child's school performance, and believed "gifted" described their children. Avoider mothers rated their child's school performance more positively and emphasized academic giftedness. When compared to Comparison children, Avoider children rated themselves as more scholastically competent on the Harter Self-Perception Profile for children while User children rated scholastic competence lower on the Importance Scale of that measure. Findings are discussed in relation to differences in the breadth of the mothers' conceptions of giftedness and use of "gifted", the belief that giftedness causes social problems, and the potential for misunderstanding between User mothers and children. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

Statement of problem. The number of studies investigating the emotional adjustment of gifted adolescents is sparse in relation to studies devoted to younger gifted children. Furthermore, incongruent findings have characterized the body of empirical evidence, thus, stimulating the debate and exploration of the association of maladjustment and giftedness. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to compare the self-perceptions of emotional adjustment of academically gifted and nongifted adolescents from both a global and multidimensional perspective. The intent of this global-multidimensional approach, in part, was to explore the saliency of specific dimensions of adjustment in gifted adolescents and to increase the accuracy of the measurement of emotional adjustment. Method. The sample included 112 academically gifted and nongifted adolescents in a public high school (grades 9-12). The study employed the Self-Report of Personality of the Behavior Assessment System for Children to compare the two groups on the global Emotional Symptoms Index and specific indexes of adjustment, including: Self-Esteem, Sense of Inadequacy, Depression, Anxiety, Social Stress, and Interpersonal Relations. Results. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that the self-perceptions of academically gifted adolescents differ significantly from their nongifted agemates' with regard to overall adjustment, self-esteem, sense of inadequacy, depression, and interpersonal relations. More specifically, the scores obtained by the academically gifted adolescents indicated that they judged themselves as better adjusted with regard to global functioning, as well as all of the aforementioned specific dimensions. The academically gifted and nongifted adolescents exhibited no significant difference in their reporting of anxiety and social stress. Conclusions. Findings suggest that academically gifted adolescents perceive themselves as well-adjusted when examined from both a global and multidimensional perspective. Current results, therefore, reflect the importance of refraining from perfunctorily associating maladjusted behaviors with giftedness when they are displayed by gifted adolescents. Consequently, behavioral manifestations of maladjustment in gifted adolescents should warrant attention. Finally, this research emphasizes the need for consideration of both global and specific dimensions of emotional functioning when attempting to identify and address the psychological and educational needs of gifted adolescents. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)