Su búsqueda

The aim of the paper was to study the intellectual profile of 94 gifted elders aged 60–90 years old with an IQ equal to or higher than 130 on at least one of the four primary indexes of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Fourth Edition. Their performances in the 15 subtests, in the Full Scale Intelligence Quotient, in the primary, supplementary and Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory Indexes, were analyzed. This group exhibited a significantly higher level of performance in all subtests and indexes than the control group matched for gender, age, and education. The differences between the two groups appear higher for the Matrix reasoning and Visual puzzle subtests. Additionally, in the gifted group the strengths seem to be represented more by Processing Speed and Perceptual Reasoning Indexes, in the control group are Comprehension Verbal and Working Memory Indexes. Moreover, gifted elders showed lower discrepancies across intellectual domains. These data provide evidence that, as the difference between the gifted group and the control group revealed in the present study is more due to processing speed, this dimension, which normaly is most affected by aging, on the contrary, is maintained/increased as a strength in the gifted elderly group. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

In Australia, gifted or talented students are defined according to the widely accepted model proposed by Gagné, where giftedness is understood as potential, and talent is shown through competencies (or achievements); in this definition there is a clear differentiation between the two constructs. Most Australian education jurisdictions espouse Gagné’s definitions and use a variety of mechanisms for identifying gifted and talented students—a commonly used identification practice is the results from the Australian National Assessment Program–Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) test. This article sets out to explore the fallacy of using the NAPLAN results to identify giftedness in high-potential (gifted) students in Australia, outlining key reasons why the NAPLAN is unsuitable as an identification instrument for giftedness. Moreover, it explores the erroneous use of the NAPLAN as an identification tool for giftedness when it was never designed, validated, or intended as such an instrument. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

The purpose of this study is to analyze the relations between social competence and mental well-being through perceptions of giftedness in gifted and general students. Data are collected from 359 gifted and general South Korean students (M age = 13.54) and analyzed by structural equation modeling. The results reveal that, first, gifted students perceive higher giftedness, social competence, and mental well-being than general students. Second, the perceived giftedness level of general students has a statistically significant partial positive mediated effect on mental well-being related to social competence. The interactive effect of social competence and perceived academic achievement on mental well-being decreases as gifted students perceive higher academic achievement. This research will facilitate the precise understanding and nurturing of gifted students under the national law and assist in constructing giftedness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Transition from primary to secondary school is an often challenging milestone in the lives of all students. Although existing research provides insight into transition for students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), research that considers transition from the perspective of students with ASD and concomitant intellectual giftedness (IG) appears scant. This paper contributes to narrowing this gap by providing insight into the experiences of 21 students with ASD and concomitant IG who had already transitioned to secondary school. Data gathered from focus group discussions revealed that this particular cohort of students experienced difficulties in gaining social acceptance by same-age peers and were unequipped to meet the expectations of secondary school teachers and an increased workload, which intensified their transition experience. These findings highlight that this cohort of students requires specific preparation and support to transition to secondary school, which was not occurring. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Hybrid homeschooling is still in its initial phase in the Iranian education system and is still a mystery to many educators and parents. This study aimed to explore the reasons for choosing the homeschooling approach for gifted students using a grounded theory method. The sample of this qualitative study included 15 parents of gifted children and 10 specialists in giftedness recruited through purposive sampling. Factors influencing the homeschooling approach were collected through semi-structured interviews with professionals and parents and analyzed by the coding method based on grounded theory (Strauss & Corbin, 1997). The data analysis revealed 143 open codes, 12 axial codes, and three selective codes, including educational challenges of gifted students in school and public education and the demands and expectations of parents and students. The results demonstrated that the Iranian educational system does not meet the needs and expectations of gifted students and their parents; therefore, educators and parents are recommended to use hybrid homeschooling for this group of students. While the participants in this study do not strictly follow a hybrid schooling model, the findings suggest that adopting elements of hybrid schooling could be advantageous for gifted students. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Stereotypical assumptions associating high levels of giftedness and outstanding performance with maladaptive behavioral characteristics and personality traits (cf. disharmony stereotype) are rather prevalent in the school context as well as in the musical domain. Such preconceptions among teachers can influence student assessment and corresponding performance expectations, which might, in turn, impact future lesson planning. In an experiment using a controlled vignette approach, the current study, with N = 211 (prospective) German music school teachers, investigated how background information, combined with a manipulated music recording, affected (prospective) music school teachers’ assessment of a fictive student’s performance, behavioral characteristics, personality traits, and teachers' consequential lesson planning. Experimental variations included the fictive student’s supposed level of giftedness, social interaction, age, and duration of instrumental lessons. Results indicated that music school teachers’ preconceptions of students assumed to be musically gifted were a high level of intellectual and musical abilities with behavioral characteristics and personality traits rated at least equivalent to those of students assumed to have average giftedness. Teachers’ lesson planning was not influenced by any of the manipulated background information. Taken together, the observed pattern of effects contradicts the disharmony stereotype but tends to align more with the harmony stereotype as music school teachers’ prevailing preconceptions about students supposed to be musically gifted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Despite the abundant literature on intelligence and high potential individuals, there is still a lack of international consensus on the terminology and clinical characteristics associated to this population. It has been argued that unstandardized use of diagnosis tools and research methods make comparisons and interpretations of scientific and epidemiological evidence difficult in this field. If multiple cognitive and psychological models have attempted to explain the mechanisms underlying high potentiality, there is a need to confront new scientific evidence with the old, to uproot a global understanding of what constitutes the neurocognitive profile of high-potential in gifted individuals. Another particularly relevant aspect of applied research on high potentiality concerns the challenges faced by individuals referred to as “twice exceptional” in the field of education and in their socio-affective life. Some individuals have demonstrated high forms of intelligence together with learning, affective or neurodevelopmental disorders posing the question as to whether compensating or exacerbating psycho-cognitive mechanisms might underlie their observed behavior. Elucidating same will prove relevant to questions concerning the possible need for differential diagnosis tools, specialized educational and clinical support. A meta-review of the latest findings from neuroscience to developmental psychology, might help in the conception and reviewing of intervention strategies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Twice-exceptional (2e) is a term used to identify students who are identified with dual diagnoses of giftedness and some type of learning challenge which qualifies them for special education programs, such as attention deficits and learning disabilities. 2e students are often overlooked in schools. In the present study, 19 existing psychoeducational assessment reports were reviewed to determine current assessment practices, particularly as they pertain to gifted and 2e students, and examine whether these practices are accurate at identifying students’ needs or special education categories. I also explored whether current practices are in alignment with recommended best practices. This study was designed to serve as a pilot study for future research on factors related to the identification of 2e students. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract) Impact statementThis study offers some preliminary insight into current psychoeducational assessment practices and their effectiveness as they pertain to twice-exceptional students. If the findings of this study can be replicated through future studies with more robust samples, they could be used to address deficiencies in existing practices and procedures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

The need to identify and recognize school going children with giftedness remains a concern of the Republic of Kazakhstan's government. This concern motivated this study to examine the internal structure of the giftedness characteristic identification scale (GCIS) for use by Kazakhstan's school children. Exploratory quantitative research approach, and its design was grounded within the exploratory type. The GCIS is a self‐report scale to identify the four characteristics of giftedness including contextual, intellectual, creative, and social giftedness. A total of 1176 elementary and middle school students were sampled for the study. The students were in grades and aged between 12 and 16 years. Most of the participants were 65% female; and 35% male. The data collected was analyzed using exploratory factor analysis. The findings established a relatively high‐reliability Cronbach alpha coefficient of 89.7%. No statistical difference was found between the Kazakh and Russian languages of instruction, based on the gifted characteristics of the participants. Emphasis was placed on the fact that the GCIS was a reliable tool to identify giftedness among schoolchildren in Kazakhstan, but much future work is needed to determine its validity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

As cognitively gifted students may be at risk for motivational problems and underachievement, it is critical to find effective ways to motivate them. Grounded in self-determination theory (SDT) and the literature on teacher beliefs and mindsets, the present study examined whether teachers adapt their motivational teaching style as a function of the cognitive ability of students and which factors can explain the variability in teachers’ use of (de)motivating styles among gifted versus typical students. Results of linear mixed modeling among 122 teachers in secondary education (73% female; M age = 39.52 years) indicated that teachers made more use of autonomy-supportive and chaotic and less use of controlling and structuring practices towards cognitively gifted, relative to typical, students, with differences in the perceived effectiveness of teaching styles by type of student explaining this variability. Regardless of students’ giftedness status, teachers’ fixed mindset related positively to the use of a controlling and chaotic style and experience in giftedness education related positively to the use of autonomy support. Misconceptions regarding giftedness did not relate to teachers’ motivating style. These results inform prevention efforts aimed at improving teachers’ motivating styles, to the benefit of the motivation of both cognitively gifted and typical students. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

The level and profile of academic achievements affect students’ development in education and beyond. However, the utility of profile interpretation is a matter of debate and there is limited knowledge on the development of academic profiles. Conversely, for research of cognitive ability profiles, specifically differentiation processes, theories and statistical tools have already been developed. Taking advantage of the conceptual and theoretical framework as well as the methodological toolbox of differentiation research, we carried out two studies on academic profile formation. The academic achievement of Luxembourgish Students in German, French, and Math was assessed with standardized tests in both studies. Study 1 examined differentiation of academic achievement with longitudinal data of 1,848 students tested in Grades 5 and 7 ( M ageT1 = 10.62, SD ageT1 = 0.66). We found more balanced academic profiles with increasing achievement level, more balanced profiles with increasing grade level, and a stronger grade level effect for higher achieving students. Study 2 analyzed cross-sectional data from 5,235 Grade 9 students ( M age = 14.97, SD age = 1.04) who attended either an academic track or a vocational track to examine the effect of different educational contexts on differentiation. There were no substantial differences between the tracks regarding profile differentiation. The results overall indicate that academic profiles become more even over time, especially in high-achieving students. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract) Impact statementThis study finds that high-achieving students in Luxembourg scored more similarly on academic tests in different domains than low-achieving students, who had more pronounced strengths and weaknesses. Students in higher grades also scored more similarly than students in lower grades. This finding suggests that for older and higher-achieving students, the focus in school may be more on high performance in all domains than on exceptional performance in one specific domain. This is conducive to high grade point average, but may be problematic for domain-specific talent development, which requires specialization and a focus on individual strengths. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

The article examines the results of a study of the resilience of teachers, students, and their parents 2 months after the start of a full-scale war in Ukraine. The total number of respondents who took part in the study is 14,556. There are employees of educational institutions (29%), students (22.41%), and parents (48.22%) from all regions of Ukraine among them. A reduced level of resilience of adult research participants (teachers, parents) and higher resilience of young people were revealed. The relationship between resilience and place of residence, forced resettlement, subjective assessment of one’s own security, involvement in various forms of education (teaching), as well as gender and age differences in resilience is presented. The results can become the basis for policy development regarding the system of support for teachers, students, and their parents in conditions of traumatic effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract) Impact statementThe results of the study of the personal experience of living in war, the level of resilience of the participants of the educational process in the conditions of full-scale military operations are presented. It is shown how all participants in the educational process cope with the traumatic challenges of war, and practical ways of help are outlined. Despite the limitations, the results of the study indicate the risks of students’ development: The war has left a significant impact on the psychoemotional state, they often experience anxiety and worry, are often not sure of their own safety, demonstrate a reduced level of resilience, which affects the educational process. The results of this study emphasize the importance of developing resilience in teachers and parents—so that they can become a support for their students and children. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

There is a lack of research on students’ conceptions of giftedness and intelligence, despite recognition of their influence on real-life factors such as achievement and motivation. This paper presents a cross-sectional mixed methods study that investigated Finnish students’ (age 6–16 years; N = 1282) implicit conceptions of giftedness and intelligence and the mindsets underlying such conceptions. More particularly, the study aimed to investigate how giftedness and intelligence are constructed and understood in the minds of students and how students’ mindsets are actualized in their descriptions of giftedness and intelligence. The results indicated that, from very early on, students differentiate between the two concepts. Giftedness and intelligence were both seen as malleable, but views on giftedness were more fixed than were conceptions of intelligence. Both age- and school-related differences were found in students’ conceptions. Furthermore, the study demonstrated differences in conceptions of giftedness and intelligence between growth- and fixed-mindset students. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

The focus of this mixed-methods study was to compare the experiences of gifted (n = 705) and non-gifted high school students (n = 341) during emergency remote education associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. The results show that both groups assessed emergency remote learning as less adequate, and judged that their general mood, well-being, and learning were worse than before the pandemic. They reported feeling more distress. MANOVA analysis revealed statistically significant differences between the two groups, but these differences were not practically important. Significant gender differences emerged, particularly in the experience of negative emotions, which were more pronounced in girls. The interaction between giftedness and gender was not statistically significant. Several positive and negative aspects of emergency remote education were identified. The findings indicate that gifted and non-gifted students experienced emergency remote education and the pandemic similarly, which suggests that professionals could plan the same post-pandemic intervention strategies to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic effects for both groups. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Reports an error in "Mental Disorders Among Gifted and Nongifted Youth: A Selected Review of The Epidemiologic Literature" by L. T. Martin, R. M. Burns and M. Schonlau ( Gifted Child Quarterly, 2010[Jan], Vol 54[1], 31-41). In the original article, an error impacting the results of the analysis occurred when the authors inadvertently flipped the interpretation of anxiety scores in the Tong and Yewchuk (1996) study. Upon reanalysis with the corrected number, the effect was not significant at the 5% significance level, but there is evidence of an effect at the 10% significance level. Rather than dichotomizing the interpretation based on p < .05, some prefer reporting the “degree of evidence”: there was weak evidence (.05 < p < .10) of a difference in anxiety between gifted and non-gifted students in this meta-analysis. The corrected Figure 2 based on this statement (using a 90% CI) is present in the erratum. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2009-24270-003). Given the ongoing debate over whether giftedness is associated with mental health disorders, there is a great need to highlight and compare results from the most methodologically rigorous studies. Surprisingly, the vast majority of literature reviews and background sections of research articles include studies that do not directly compare gifted and nongifted youth. Furthermore, almost no attention has been paid to how differences in the definitions of giftedness or mental health outcomes of interest affect the interpretation and comparison of studies. The authors apply an epidemiologic perspective for thinking about these issues, highlight many of the challenges of studying this population, and present results from meta-analyses that include the most methodologically rigorous studies comparing rates of depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety, suicide ideation, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) between gifted and nongifted youth. They conclude with recommendations to strengthen research in this area. Putting the research to use: Through this review we sought to provide concrete recommendations to strengthen future research on the mental health of gifted children. Most notably, future studies should assess large, population-based cohorts that include both gifted and nongifted individuals. Researchers should also move toward describing their study population according to their specific aptitudes, talents, skills or abilities, rather than using the general term ‘gifted’. Thinking more specifically about these relationships will not only help us to understand the association between giftedness and mental health, but will also increase the potential to effectively shape programs and policies for gifted youth, focusing resources on the most vulnerable. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

Despite multiple edited volumes dedicated to the various theories and conceptions of giftedness and talent that have been published over the past 40 years, the field of gifted education is still definitionally and paradigmatically fractured. These differences have led to a misunderstanding about the social and emotional experiences of gifted individuals that has further divided the field of gifted education. One purpose of this paper is to explain how varying definitions and paradigms of giftedness lead us to different answers and assumptions about the social and emotional experiences of gifted individuals, and the implications of those. The other purpose of this paper is to outline a framework for moving forward in thinking about and conducting research on the social and emotional experiences of gifted individuals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

In two pre-registered studies we investigated the cognitive context of gratitude to God (GTG) and fading positive affect of grateful memories. Although gratitude has been shown to causally impact happiness, few studies have investigated how the nature of the benefactor might affect experienced gratitude. Participants first recalled a positive event, a human-caused benefit, or a God-caused benefit. After recall they reported their current momentary emotions, recalled past emotions from the time of the event and emotion appraisals. Grateful memories showed less fading positive affect over time compared to other positive memories. Appraisals of value and altruism predicted both GTG and gratitude to humans (GTH). Positive spiritual appraisals (e.g. positive interpretations about one’s relationship with God, the sacred giftedness of the event) were uniquely associated with GTG. When it comes to felt gratitude, the nature of the benefactor does matter. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

The authors introduce readers to quantitative text analysis and its potential for analyzing text-based nonreactive measures as a means of broadening the evidential basis within research on giftedness and talent. After defining quantitative text analysis and describing how it can augment survey studies for analyses at individual and cultural levels, the special potential of quantitative text analysis for addressing cultural questions within gifted and talented research is described. Inductive and deductive techniques of quantitative text analysis are then introduced and illustrated with brief examples drawn from gifted and talented research. Finally, a brief illustrative study is presented via an extended series of linked worked examples focusing on the question of the place of giftedness and talent within mentoring discourse in US mass media of past and present in order to illustrate in more detail how quantitative text analysis can be used to improve the culture-level evidence base within gifted and talented education. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Introduction: In this article, we focus on the experiences of gifted adolescents who are victims of bullying in the form of rumors. How do they experience this relational aggression and this social isolation when belonging to a peer network is essential at this age? Are they more vulnerable or more resilient? A systemic perspective led us to consider all the factors within these perpetrator-victim-management team systems that are involved in the rumor spreading. Patients and method: We conducted a qualitative study of three situations based on Lazarus and Folkman's transactional model to analyze the processes at work within each system in the rumor spreading. Results: The results show that the teenager who spreads the rumor does so in the name of his or her anti-violence values, without considering the context in which the events took place and the subjective experience of the protagonists. It is also a way for him or her to establish his or her popularity within the group. Each of the three gifted boys reacted differently. Struggling to identify the roles of victim and perpetrator, the institution administrator did not perceive the situation as a case of bullying and may even have credited the rumor. Discussion: Our discussion focuses on the personal and family factors of the population in this study, the current societal context with the MeToo movement and the cancel culture, and the limitations of school-based anti-bullying interventions. These three studies show the need to alert and inform education professionals to a systemic understanding when it comes to the spreading of these rumors in adolescence. These acquired skills will then allow them to be more efficient as mediators in these situations, sometimes with dramatic consequences for vulnerable individuals. Conclusion: Giftedness appears as a secondary characteristic compared to emotional competencies. Nevertheless, certain personality traits often observed in gifted subjects, such as overexcitability or a particular sense of humor, are active in transactions between the different systems. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract) Resumen en idioma originalIntroduction: Dans cet article, nous nous intéressons au vécu des adolescents haut potentiel qui sont la cible d’une rumeur. Comment vivent-ils cette agression relationnelle et cet isolement social à un âge où l’appartenance à un groupe de pairs est essentielle ? Sont-ils plus vulnérables ou plus résilients que les autres ? Une perspective systémique nous amène à prendre en compte l’ensemble des facteurs au sein de ces systèmes calomniateur-cible-équipe encadrante au sein desquels ce phénomène de propagation de rumeurs se déroule. Patients et méthode: Nous avons effectué une étude qualitative de trois situations en nous appuyant sur le modèle transactionnel de Lazarus et Folkman pour analyser les processus en jeu pour chaque système dans la propagation de la rumeur. Résultats: Les résultats montrent que l’adolescent qui répand la rumeur le fait au nom de ses valeurs de lutte contre la violence, sans tenir compte du contexte dans lequel les faits se sont passés et de l’expérience subjective des protagonistes. C’est aussi un moyen pour lui d’asseoir sa popularité dans le groupe. Les trois sujets à haut potentiel réagissent chacun différemment. La direction de l’établissement, en difficulté pour identifier les rôles de chacun, victime et agresseur, ne perc¸ oit pas la situation comme un cas de harcèlement et peut même créditer la rumeur. Discussion: Notre discussion porte sur les facteurs personnels et familiaux des sujets de cette étude, sur le contexte sociétal actuel avec le mouvement MeToo et la cancel culture et sur les limites des interventions scolaires de lutte contre le harcèlement. Ces trois études montrent la nécessité de sensibiliser les professionnels de l’éducation à une lecture systémique de ces rumeurs à l’adolescence. Ces compétences acquises leur permettront alors de jouer un rôle actif de médiateur dans ces situations parfois dramatiques chez des sujets fragilisés. Conclusion: Le haut potentiel apparaît comme une caractéristique secondaire par rapport aux compétences émotionnelles. Néanmoins, certains traits de personnalité souvent observés chez les sujets à haut potentiel, comme une hyperstimulabilité ou un humour particulier, participent aux transactions entre les différents systèmes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

A systematic review was carried out on publications from the last 15 years that have studied the effect of intellectual giftedness, defined as IQ > 115, on the clinical and cognitive features of ADHD. Studies indicate that about 15% of people with high IQ meet ADHD criteria. IQ has shown no effect on the pharmacological treatment, and comorbidity does not differ from that of other children with ADHD. High IQ-ADHD, compared to average IQ-ADHD, tends to show less severity in cognitive and behavioral symptoms, as well as a better prognosis; however high IQ may mask ADHD symptoms delaying diagnosis and treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)