Su búsqueda

This book is a scholarly overview of modern concepts, definitions, and theories of intellectual giftedness, and of past and current developments in the field of gifted education. The authors consider, in some detail, the roles of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom in giftedness and the interaction between culture and giftedness, as well as how giftedness can be understood in terms of a construct of developing expertise. The authors also review and discuss a set of key studies that address the issues of identification and education of children with intellectual gifts. This volume maybe used as a summary overview of the field for educators, psychologists, social workers, and other professionals who serve intellectually gifted children and their families. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: book)

This reprinted article originally appeared in Parenting for High Potential, December 2003. For many years, our definition of giftedness has been based on the interaction of three characteristics: above-average (but not necessarily superior) ability, creativity, and task commitment. In other words, high ability is not enough to explain giftedness. It also takes an intensity and focus in a certain area, along with the willingness to try new ideas or look at something with a different perspective. Gifted behaviors occur when these three components intersect, and this happens in some people (not all people) at certain times (not all times), and under certain circumstances (not all circumstances). We only recently began to turn our attention to understanding more fully the sources of these gifted behaviors and, more importantly, the ways in which people use their gifts and talents in a constructive and positive way. This article addresses the following questions: (1) Can a better understanding of people who use their gifts for the greater good help us create conditions that expand the number of people who willingly contribute to the growth of both social and economic capital?; and (2) How can parents provide opportunities so their children develop their abilities in responsible ways? (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

This reprinted article originally appeared in Parenting for High Potential, September 2007. A child's primary care physician can play an important role early in the life of a gifted child. In today's healthcare arena, medical professionals are the first line of treatment and the gatekeepers for more specialized services. We discuss several issues related to the role of physicians, including what information a physician might need to know, why it is important for them to understand both your child and giftedness, how to discuss these issues, and finally what roles physicians can play outside of the typical medical domain. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

This reprinted article originally appeared in Parenting for High Potential, March 1997. The article reminds us about the importance of keeping our own beliefs and assumptions about children's potential in check. In the discussion of how giftedness and talent is manifested, the author offers some consideration for the genetic background of the child; however a stronger case is made for a stimulating and nurturing environment as a more powerful force in the talent development process. The author then offers specific ways in which parents and teachers can optimize the development and learning of young children. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: book)

This reprinted article originally appeared in Parenting for High Potential, March 2006. Based on a survey of 5,400 students from grades 3 to 8 and meetings with 400 students, the author explores the social-emotional landscape of today's middle schoolers. Regardless of how gifted children appear, fourth, fifth, and sixth graders, even among high achievers, have marked anxieties about social acceptance and popularity. The article counsels parents to let their gifted children enjoy their childhood—to challenge them in ways that feed their gifts, but without pushing them into early adulthood. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: book)

This reprinted article originally appeared in Parenting for High Potential, June 2001. One of the most neglected subpopulations of gifted students with multiple exceptionalities is gifted children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The author first became interested in gifted children with ADHD when one of her sons was diagnosed with ADHD in middle school. From her research and experience, the author notes that children who have ADHD and also are gifted tend to have more severe social and emotional problems than do children who only have giftedness alone or ADHD alone. Their intellectual giftedness did not protect them from the problems associated with ADHD, and may have actually made them more pronounced. The article offers some suggestions that may help parents and educators of gifted children with ADHD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: book)

This guide covers topics such as working with high achievers and young gifted children, acceleration, advocating for talented students, serving as role models and mentors for gifted kids, homeschooling, underachievement, twice-exceptional students, and postsecondary opportunities. The guidebook will allow parents to find the support and resources they need to help their children find success in school and beyond. Written by experts in the field of gifted education, this book will provide guidance, advice, and support for parents of gifted children. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: cover)

This reprinted article originally appeared in Parenting for High Potential, June 1997. The article provides an alternative to the over-reliance upon traditional intelligence testing or using only an IQ score as the primary indicator of giftedness. Rather, the author offers his theory of successful intelligence, whereby individuals identify and cultivate their strengths and figure out ways to compensate or correct for their relative weaknesses. The author punctuates the explanation of his theory with a call to action for parents and teachers; research findings suggest that students who are offered instruction in ways that allow them to play to their strengths and minimize their weaknesses outperform those who were not offered such flexibility. In short, not scoring high on a traditional intelligence test can be overcome by considering strengths more broadly and playing to those strengths. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: book)

Raising happy, successful children is a goal of every parent of gifted children. In On the Social and Emotional Lives of Gifted Children, the nation's leading authority on the psychology of gifted children offers advice and encouragement for both parents and teachers. In a thoughtful, conversational style, the author offers an in-depth look at the complex social and emotional issues faced by gifted children. This revised and updated fourth edition of the popular text contains more than 10 new chapters, featuring contributions by scholars on gifted children's development from across the nation. On the Social and Emotional Lives of Gifted Children tackles important and timely issues dealing with the social and emotional needs of today's gifted children, including who gifted children are and what giftedness means; how parents, teachers, and counselors can guide gifted children; the issues facing gifted students in the 21st century such as technology and terrorism; and how the education of gifted children can adapt for the future. This concise, sensitive look at gifted children and their social and emotional world offers unique insights for both teachers and parents who support these special children. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: cover)

An overview of definitions of giftedness, special populations of gifted and talented children, methods of identification, and a continuum of services are summarized in this chapter. These services include organizational strategies (such as instructional grouping options), instructional strategies (such as acceleration and enrichment options), and a variety of talent development opportunities that should be included in a continuum of services that will engage and challenge all gifted and talented students. Also included in this chapter are some social and emotional challenges that may affect gifted and high potential children, such as the potential underachievement of children who do not encounter sufficient challenge in school. The chapter ends with a summary of research about the effectiveness of grouping, instructional, and talent development strategies, as well as recommendations for the creation of a continuum of services in each school district that will challenge and engage all students. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

What is it that leads children to be similar in some ways but different in others, whether they are identical twins, fraternal twins, ordinary siblings, or simply two children of the same age? This chapter will deal with this question. The focus of the chapter will be on cognitive skills, although, of course, children can be similar and different with respect to many other kinds of skills as well. The chapter is divided into five parts. In the first part of the chapter, I will briefly describe seven main paradigms that have been used for understanding individual differences in cognitive development. In the second part of the chapter, I will discuss at some length three of these paradigms for understanding individual differences in cognition. In the third part of the chapter, I will discuss origins and stability of individual differences, in particular, issues of heritability and modifiability of cognitive skills. In the fourth part of the chapter, I will discuss extremes in individual differences: giftedness and retardation in cognitive skills. In the fifth part of the chapter, I will discuss group differences and their relationship to individual differences in cognitive skills. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

The study of gifts and talents and how innate abilities interact with one's environment, personality, educational opportunities, family support, and life experiences has fascinated psychologists, educators, and parents for decades. Why is it that one child with remarkably high potential born into a particular family in a particular environment grows up to become a neurosurgeon while a child of similar intellectual potential who lives in the same community and attends the same schools, decides to drop out of high school? What have researchers and scholars learned in the last few decades about the nature of talent development and intellectual giftedness? In this chapter, these questions, none of which can be answered simply, are discussed and current research about intellectual giftedness is summarized. As the research points out, one of the core concepts that has emerged about intellectual giftedness in the last few decades relates to its diversity, for there is no more varied group of people than those labeled intellectually gifted. Despite this broad diversity, however, several common themes about intellectual giftedness and the conditions for its development exist. We begin our review of the research related to intellectual giftedness with a discussion of these themes, summarizing highlights about research on intellectual giftedness in the United States, including the seminal work of Lewis Terman, and presenting an overview of what we believe to be some interesting and potentially important American theories to date. We conclude the chapter with some interesting research-based trends related to new ideas in defining and developing academic gifts and talents. It is important to understand, however, that there is no agreed-upon consensus about who is gifted and no final answers about our evolving understandings of how intellectual giftedness develops and the characteristics that help us to identify and nurture intellectual gifts and talents. To introduce the challenge associated with both defining and identifying giftedness in students, four brief case studies are introduced in the first section of the chapter. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence provides the most comprehensive and up-to-date compendium of theory and research in the field of human intelligence. The forty-two chapters are written by world-renowned experts, each in his or her respective field, and collectively, the chapters cover the full range of topics of contemporary interest in the study of intelligence. The handbook is divided into nine parts: Part I covers intelligence and its measurement; Part II deals with the development of intelligence; Part III discusses intelligence and group differences; Part IV concerns the biology of intelligence; Part V is about intelligence and information processing; Part VI discusses different kinds of intelligence; Part VII covers intelligence and society; Part VIII concerns intelligence in relation to allied constructs; and Part IX is the concluding chapter, which reflects on where the field is currently and where it still needs to go. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: jacket)

This chapter presents a definition of the gifted/talented individual, a model of giftedness, and provides examples of student characteristics in specific areas of giftedness to help in identification of gifted children. Many authors have described characteristics of gifted and talented students, some in general terms across several domains, whereas others have described them for specific areas cited in the federal and state definitions. Because most school districts identify children for programs that are related to the definition, this chapter organizes the characteristics according to these specific areas. The term "gifted and talented," when used in respect to students, children or youth, means students, children or youth who give evidence of high performance capability in areas such as intellectual, creative, artistic, or leadership capacity, or in specific academic fields, and who require services or activities not ordinarily provided by the school in order to fully develop such capabilities. This concept of capability or potential is addressed in Gagne's Differentiated Model of Giftedness and Talent, Gagne has proposed that "gifts," which are natural abilities, must be developed to become "talents," which emerge through the systematic learning, training, and practicing "of skills characteristic of a particular field of human activity or performance". The development of gifts into talents may be facilitated or hindered by two types of catalysts: intrapersonal and environmental. Many authors have described characteristics of gifted and talented students, some in general terms across several domains, whereas others have described them for specific areas cited in the federal and state definitions. Because most school districts identify children for programs that are related to the definition, this chapter organizes the characteristics according to these specific areas. Professionals who are primarily responsible for the identification process must remember that gifted and talented students must have an opportunity to perform. Students who are in classrooms where no differentiation is present are less likely to exhibit these characteristics. In addition, gifted and talented students will demonstrate many, but not all, of the characteristics that are listed in each area or may show potential or performance in only one area. It is important that professionals, parents, and others involved in the identification process look for these characteristics over a period of time and in a variety of situations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

Alan Carr's Positive Psychology has become essential reading for anyone requiring a thorough and accessible introduction to the field. This new edition retains all the features that made the first edition so popular, including: accounts of major theories and relevant research learning objectives chapter summaries research and personal development questions suggestions for further reading measures for use in research a glossary of terms. The book has also been completely updated to take account of recent research and major advances, and includes a new chapter on positive psychotherapy, an extended account of research on character strengths and virtues, and a discussion of recent ground-breaking research on emotional intelligence. This new edition of Positive Psychology will prove a valuable resource for psychology students and lecturers, as well as those involved in postgraduate training in related areas such as clinical psychology, social work, counseling, and psychotherapy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: book)

In the present research, we examine the relationship between giftedness in the area of academic intrinsic motivation and leadership roles undertaken by such highly motivated adolescents within a longitudinal study of development. This chapter presents (1) theory and research on gifted motivation; (2) empirical validation of the gifted motivation construct; (3) linking motivational giftedness to leadership; and (4) research results in the Fullerton Longitudinal Study (FLS) on motivational giftedness and leadership. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

Offers an overview of Response to Intervention (RtI) models and principles, a tiered approach to supports and services, and how gifted students and students with high potential who have not yet been formally identified might fit within different tiers of instruction. Tier 1 instruction generally includes a validated, evidence-based program that is used with all students. Students who show advanced progress with Tier 1 instruction receive collaborative interventions—Tier 2. Tier 3 instruction is for those students who need comprehensive interventions and most often involves referral to specialized services. The chapter also emphasizes the importance of early intervention to ensure that problems are prevented and strengths are not diminished. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: preface)

This chapter discusses the neuropsychology of gifted children including history and assessment, neurobiology, the existing literature, specific hypothetical substrates: neurohormones; localization models, and the pathology of superiority, pathology of superiority, and finally, special considerations for assessment. Much of our knowledge about neurocognition has been derived from the study of pathology. This is logical, as exploring the exceptional is clarifying. The exceptional exaggerates normal traits or processes and renders them more visible, or it exposes aberrance and disease process. Most of our research focuses on the left tail of the normal curve, paying little attention to the able. The right tail is just as statistically unusual, albeit neglected. This is because the study of talent and intellectual ability is a suspect preoccupation. Finding research funds to study giftedness has been likened to "begging for the rich." Much of the data gathered on the neurobiology of intellectually exceptional individuals is gleaned from control group data, unfunded research, or as a serendipitous finding. Despite this, a literature on the exceptionally capable exists, scattered broadly through the neurobiology literature. Before exploring the topic in detail, it is helpful to define terms. The first premise of this chapter is that giftedness exists and is measurable through a number of methods. Gifted refers to individuals functioning in the top 3-5% in the nation, on objective, standardized measures or to individuals performing at an elite level in specific, recognized domains such as music. Giftedness refers to a series of particular talents and abilities that are not evenly distributed. As such, it is a loaded concept. Much of the educational literature on giftedness is a study of cultural anxiety. Intellectual ability is not character or moral value. The most common attempts to cope with this moral anxiety is by negating the existence of individual difference, which often leads to surreal arguments (e.g., "every child is gifted" is of equivalent value to "every child is retarded"). Premise number two of this chapter is that there are biological underpinnings or qualitative differences in thought processes that require qualitative differences in the neural substrates. Third, talents can coexist with impairment and this impairment can be environmentally driven. The full expression of an emergent talent or deficit is a product of both internal and external factors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

In the discourse on the intellectual styles of exceptional learners, three specific issues readily present themselves. The first issue is the diversity of exceptional learners. By exceptional learners, one refers to a heterogeneous group of learners that includes, among others, learners with dyslexia, learners with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), learners with autism spectrum disorder, and highly able or gifted learners. The question is whether there are distinct intellectual styles or profiles of styles for distinct groups of exceptional learners. The second issue has to do with the connection between abilities and styles. Perhaps what set exceptional learners apart from normal nonexceptional learners are their profiles of marked strengths and weaknesses, which are likely to correspond to their areas of giftedness and deficits. It is likely that there is a possibly stronger ability-style connection among exceptional learners, given that exceptionality is often defined in terms of abilities (talents) or disabilities (deficits). The question is whether or not exceptional learners are predisposed to prefer specific intellectual styles in line with their abilities and disabilities. The third issue is the role of intellectual styles in the teaching and learning of exceptional learners. Given the possibly stronger ability-style connection, the question is whether or not instruction matching intellectual styles of exceptional learners should assume greater importance in the effective teaching and learning of these more able and more vulnerable learners. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

Creativity is one of the most important and permanent human behaviors for all individuals (Simonton, 2000). The individuals' creativity are in different phases, degrees, magnitudes, and means, which makes creativity "a multifaceted phenomenon rather than a single unitary construct capable of a precise definition" (Isaksen, 1987, p. 8). Creativity has qualitative and distinct characteristics that are part of the individuals' intelligence, which includes (a) divergent-convergent and primary-secondary thinking systems; (b) critical-analytical thinking processes, intuition, imagination, elaboration, creative results, novelty, and meaning; and (c) specific personal and environmental facets (Torrance, 1981). Teachers contend that the importance of their profession goes beyond merely preparing young children for future work. Recently teachers seem to promote the development of the children's creativity. According to Esquivel (1995), the progress of this concept has developed slowly due to "(1) an increased understanding of the nature of creativity as a distinct process, amendable to training; (2) historical developments that led to educational reform and innovative practices, emphasizing giftedness and creative abilities; (3) research findings on teacher variables, instructional behaviors, and learning environments effective in fostering creativity; and (4) the development and evaluation of creative curriculum methods and programs to be implemented by the teacher in the classroom" (p. 185). Esquivel (1995) shows that interest has emerged in creative teaching within the framework of the aforementioned educational improvements, concentrating on the teachers' roles. Teachers seem to have become more receptive to creativity, which they have perceived as indicating "open- mindedness, exploration, the celebration of difference and originality ... an automatic opposition to the language of targets, to instrumental skills, the measurement of outcomes and the dogmas of accountability" (Cullingford, 2007, p. 133). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)