Su búsqueda

This summary will explore the coexistence of intellectual giftedness and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), two disparate, complex conditions that present additional complexities when they are present in the same person. Because these complexities manifest themselves uniquely and on an individual basis, and because of the limited research on the combined gifted/ADHD condition, it is necessary to understand each construct singly in order to frame a discussion of the combined condition. Research pertaining to the underlying physiology, diagnostic methods, and intervention strategies that are relevant to the combined condition will be the focus of this discussion. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

As conceptions of giftedness expanded, researchers provided support for views of giftedness that went beyond high cognitive potential, and more persons became interested in affective issues, moral and ethical development, and what we will describe as intelligences outside the normal curve. A better understanding of people who use their gifts in socially constructive ways can help us create conditions that expand the number of people who contribute to the growth of social as well as economic capital. In the sections that follow, we examine the scientific research that defines several categories of personal characteristics that have been associated with such commitments and form the basis for Operation Houndstooth Theory: Optimism, Courage, Romance With a Topic or Discipline, Sensitivity to Human Concerns, Physical/Mental Energy, and Vision/Sense of Destiny. We will refer to these traits as co-cognitive factors because they interact with and enhance the cognitive traits that we ordinarily associate with the development of human abilities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

Discusses what we do and do not know about giftedness in the early years, roughly birth to age 7. In this chapter, we focus on cognitive and academic giftedness because, with few exceptions—mainly case studies—that is the major kind of giftedness about which there exists coherent research-based knowledge. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

Schools must look further than the current "gifted" population and closer than do the current instruments in the identification process. This is precisely what our new identification battery of gifted and talented students, the Aurora Battery, is intended to make possible. Developed from Sternberg's theory of successful intelligence, this group-administered assessment battery is designed to recognize abilities in analytical, creative, and practical domains using figures, words, and numbers. The augmented view of intelligence adopted by the assessment, in combination with the specificity of its tasks, is expected to capture a more diverse population of students with a more varied and better-qualified array of skills. We present here the impetus for creating this assessment: historical shifts in definitions of giftedness, the increasingly recognized ethical imperative to correct underrepresentation of certain groups, the shortcomings of current assessments, and the promise of future reward that greater investment in gifted children represents. We also discuss the assessment's theoretical grounding, development, and potential applications. The Aurora Battery may offer a new and better assessment alternative for schools interested in better recognizing all gifts and better meeting the needs of all gifted students. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

This chapter will illustrate how one team of researchers and curriculum developers designed a program addressing the needs of different learner profiles that enabled teachers to serve—and assess—all of the students in their classroom, including gifted students. The program was not designed for the exclusive use in gifted classrooms, but rather, offers a model for teaching that will benefit both gifted students and children not identified as such. First, we provide a brief review of existing definitions of giftedness. We then present the principles of Teaching for Successful Intelligence (TSI) and show how this instructional approach can help teachers meet the needs of students of varying levels of ability. Finally, we present concrete examples from an elementary school intervention based on TSI. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

Reviews the research on giftedness and talent in the arts. Topics addressed include: the nature and identification of giftedness/talent in the arts; and factors supporting artistic talent development. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

The major research question related to self-concept and gifted students is the extent to which the self-concept facets of gifted students are comparable to the self-concept of average-ability students. A related question involves the extent to which giftedness interacts with the process of self-concept development. A third research question relates to the impact of placement of intellectually gifted students in gifted programs on their self-concept facets. A fourth research question focuses on the congruity between self-concept ratings and demonstrated accomplishments. A final research question relates to the generalizability of findings across various subgroups of gifted students (gifted females, culturally diverse gifted, students with gifts and disabilities, creatively gifted students). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

Robinson provides an important cautionary tale about the use of alternative assessments. She clearly argues for the retention of more traditional tests as a way of ensuring that underrepresented populations are not overlooked in the identification process. In crafting her argument for traditional tests, she cites literature supporting the use of both aptitude and achievement tests to find students who already are demonstrating giftedness, the majority of students we seek to find. In identifying students of promise, she suggests that such tests may be useful but far from conclusive in locating these students, suggesting that traditional measures also need to be considered. An important issue raised in her chapter is that of the purpose for which the testing is done, noting the need to provide the optimal match between the tools employed to find students and the program provided to serve them. If giftedness is defined as advanced cognitive development, then we have many traditional measures that can identify it, according to Robinson. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: book)

This is the definitive reference book for those searching for a summary and evaluation of the literature on giftedness and gifted education. The book presents 50 summaries of important topics in the field, providing relevant research and a guide to how the research applies to gifted education. Sample topics addressed include alternative assessment, counseling, early childhood, highly gifted students, homeschooling, parenting, and policy and advocacy. Each chapter adopts a rigorous, empirically grounded approach to inform the reader's understanding of the research in gifted education. This book provides an objective assessment of the status of available knowledge in each area, offers guidance in the application of the research, and suggests areas of needed research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: cover)

In this chapter, we report and synthesize the major findings in the specific domain of mathematics with direct implications for the secondary curriculum. We draw on the relevant literature from international journals in mathematics education, gifted education, and philosophy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

The following chapter addresses the following questions: (1) How well do various forms of assessment predict behaviors that are associated with gifted students or that are required of students in the gifted program in which students are placed? (2) To what extent do various forms of assessment actually measure the constituents of giftedness? and (3) To what extent can identification procedures be made more equitable with respect to issues such as race and SES? Although there are numerous studies that deal with the identification of gifted students, I will focus on a few that are historically significant and that have affected practice in the field of gifted education before turning to some more recent studies that exemplify current concerns. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

A discussion of all of the different conceptions of giftedness is beyond the scope of this chapter; therefore, only those conceptions for which there is evidence of use in the U.S. school system and/or those conceptions with evidence of empirical validation are described here. In addition to presenting a general overview of the influence of an individual's personal conception of giftedness, this chapter will address the terms used in the literature, particularly as these are associated with the major theorists in the field; the major questions that are addressed in research and the available empirical support for different conceptions; the limitations and the practical implications of the research; and the major references and resources for obtaining further information. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

Sternberg explores a new use for alternative assessment as a value-added aspect of identification of gifted learners, exploring the employment of practical and creative performance-based assessment tasks as part of a college admissions process at a selective university. Rather than discontinue the use of the SAT, which he argues measures primarily analytical abilities, he and his Rainbow Project collaborators devised a system that added additional tasks to the college application form, resulting in finding more minority students who qualified for admission during the pilot year of the initiative. The theory underlying this new "Rainbow Assessment" is the theory of successful intelligence (Sternberg, 1997), which also forms the basis for a theory of giftedness (Sternberg, 2000, 2005). His pilot use of this multifaceted testing approach at grades 4-7 also is briefly described. Sternberg concludes his chapter by asserting the need to identify for diversity and to validate tests that are successful in doing so. Such a stance provides a strong purpose for identification, yet it is clearly different from our testing history that has sought to identify the students who are most advanced in cognitive development across and within areas of learning. Sternberg then raises an important issue about the core purposes of testing for gifted programs: Should diversity trump evidence of advanced ability? (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: create)

Assessing nontraditional students who come from culturally diverse backgrounds, low socioeconomic households, or who have limited English language proficiency has long been a concern in psychology and education. With an increasingly large and diverse student body in U.S. schools, there has been a corresponding press for equitable assessment and representative identification of ethnic and racial minority students for inclusion in special education programs, including programs for the gifted and talented. Additional efforts and new directions have been required to ensure that equitable assessment and identification practices are employed for all students in U.S. schools, especially for those nontraditional students who historically have been disenfranchised by the educational system. This chapter explores two innovative and promising strategies for accurately and representatively identifying diverse populations of students as gifted and talented, while reducing the sometimes biased overlays of language, culture, and poverty. The two primary instruments addressed in this chapter are the Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test (Bracken & McCallum, 1998), which assesses cognitive functioning from a nonverbal assessment paradigm, and the Clinical Assessment of Behavior (Bracken & Keith, 2004a), which assesses teachers' and parents' perceptions of students' behavioral functioning, including important behaviors associated with giftedness (e.g., social skills, competence, executive functioning). Other instruments will be mentioned in passing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

The problem of deciding what criteria to use to identify giftedness remains an intractable one in the field. Giftedness has traditionally been taken to mean intellectual giftedness, and the gifted have often been identified through IQ achievement, or other formal tests of school-based skills. To avoid an IQ bias, the discussion in this chapter relies heavily on studies whose gifted subjects were selected by other means. Even though their findings are drawn primarily from testlike settings, these researchers' observations of the students' thinking processes are detailed and comprehensive, thus allowing for comparisons with information from other sources. The following discussion takes into consideration not only intellectual abilities but also artistic talents in cases where both share similar cognitive characteristics. Studies on artistic talent use subjects who had distinguished themselves through class performance, auditions, or products. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

Alternative Assessments with Gifted and Talented Students provides a concise and thorough introduction to methods for identifying and assessing the learning of gifted students in the school setting. Including overviews of assessment tools and alternative methods of assessment, as well as pertinent discussions concerning the need to identify gifted and talented students, this book combines research and experience from leading scholars in the field of gifted education in a convenient guide for teachers, administrators, and gifted education program directors. Topics covered include the need for nonverbal testing with traditionally unidentified students; the identification of students from minority populations; the value of using traditional assessments with students; the role of creativity tools as a measure of giftedness; and the use of portfolios, products, and performance-based assessment to document learning and modify instruction accordingly; among others. This guide to assessing and identifying gifted students is for anyone serving and working with this population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: cover)

This chapter addresses the major issues facing educators, administrators, and parents in nurturing mathematical talent in students at the elementary level. The focus is on presenting relevant research and guidance on the application of this research so that the reader will be able to make informed decisions that will benefit young mathematically gifted students. Providing appropriate curriculum for mathematically gifted students is complex, in part because the definition of mathematical giftedness is not universal. How one defines mathematical giftedness in turn affects how students are identified for services and how the actual services, including the curriculum, are rendered. Thus, to get a true picture of the research associated with curriculum for elementary mathematics gifted education, several areas need to be addressed. To varying degrees, the research addresses the following questions related to providing appropriate curriculum for mathematically gifted elementary students: (1) How can we identify students who are mathematically gifted? (2) What kinds of programming options for these students have research support? (3) What instructional approaches and grouping models work best for these options? and (4) What research-based curriculum is appropriate for mathematically gifted elementary students? (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

What does it mean to be gifted? Is there something different about the neurobiology of a gifted person compared to us average people? If so, what is it? These are questions that have been debated for years and ones that I have attempted to address here. The approach discussed in the current chapter takes into consideration a number of general neural operating principles that may be used to guide future studies of giftedness. In this chapter I present a theory of neural processing that is derived from the use of functional neuroimaging, particularly functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The major proposal of this chapter is that how well the neural system can adapt to changes in the environment will affect the quality and efficiency of its processing, thereby constituting a major source of individual differences in cognitive processing. Adaptability is assessed here by examining neural efficiency, the malleability of processing networks, and functional connectivity. These measures are used because how well someone can adapt to fluctuations in the computational demands is thought to be correlated with these measures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

Many in the field of gifted education have suggested that new conceptions of giftedness and a new paradigm for identifying and selecting students will help low socioeconomic and minority students become more represented in gifted programs. This new paradigm of identification would recognize the different ways in which students display giftedness and would call for more varied and authentic assessments. Based on our current understanding of the problem of underrepresentation of low-income and minority students in gifted programs and preliminary studies, the use of performance-based assessment as a nontraditional tool for enhancing the possibility of greater representation of such students in these programs appears to be a promising development. Performance assessments focus on challenging open-ended problems that require high-level thinking and problem solving, and put an emphasis on the process the student uses to come to an answer rather than on whether or not the student can quickly find the right answer. This chapter examines the academic and social-emotional impact of performance task assessment, utilizing data from a follow-up study of gifted students' identification and achievement profiles over 6 years and vignette analyses of students of special prototypes in terms of SES, ethnic membership, and ability profiles. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

Giftedness is, in large part, a function of creativity in generating ideas, analytical intelligence in evaluating the quality of these ideas, practical intelligence in implementing the ideas and convincing others to value and follow the ideas, and wisdom to ensure that the decisions and their implementation is for the common good of all stakeholders. The model is referred to as WICS—wisdom, intelligence, creativity, synthesized—although the order of elements in the acronym is intended only to make it pronounceable. This chapter considers the elements of creativity, intelligence and wisdom, in that order, because it represents the order in which the elements often are initially used. As gifted performance evolves, however, the elements become interactive and so order becomes less relevant. The chapter then considers how the concepts can be employed in teaching and assessment, and finally, how they can be employed in identifying the gifted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)