Su búsqueda

A serious critique often made against giftedness research is an alleged neglect of the aspects of developmental psychology. We are therefore more than pleased that Marion Porath has agreed to assemble a series of papers on this topic and serve as Guest Editor for this edition of High Ability Studies. This edition is made complete by a fascinating case study submitted by Larisa V. Shavinina which she developed on the basis of the concept of entrepreneurial giftedness, and therewith fills a gap in our field of research. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

An introduction is given to the papers included in the present issue of High Ability Studies, which continues the tradition of presenting target articles which have been reviewed and commented on by eminent colleagues. In this issue Françoys Gagné (see record 2004-22507-002) submits his DMGT Model to discussion. To supplement the peer commentaries, additional questions are posed to which Professor Gagné presents his opinions. In his article 'Intelligence current in creative activities' Jiannong Shi (see record 2004-22507-011) undertakes a remarkable attempt to establish a theoretical bridge between the concepts of intelligence and creativity. In their highly interesting contribution 'Shona culture of Zimbabwe's view of giftedness' Constantine Ngara and Marion Porath (see record 2004-22507-012) make the case for fusing together the cultural and scientific views of giftedness in the school curriculum in order to develop a diversity of talents in students. Additional contributions include 'A review of primary and secondary influences on sport expertise' by Joe Baker and Sean Horton (see record 2004-22507-013), 'Cross-cultural predictors of mathematical talent and academic productivity' by Petri Nokelainen, Kirsi Tirri and James Reed (see record 2004-22507-014)and 'Explaining high abilities of Nobel laureates' by Larisa V. Shavinina (see record 2004-22507-015). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

This Editorial presents seven original contributions from authors around the globe which are not only interesting for researchers, but also for practitioners. In the first contribution authors introduce what they call a universal model of giftedness. It is a hybrid approach that combines strengths of previous models into a promising new model. It will be interesting to see how well is received in the scientific communtity and if it will be used by practitioners to guide their development of gifted education provisions. In line with this trend authors pose the important question if being gifted is always an advantage? In particular, they were interested in differences with regard to social accceptance and self-concept. Their empirical study shows a generally positive situation of gifted adolscents, however, individual differences are substantial. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved)

Comments on article by Ericsson, Roring and Nandagopal (see record 2007-12554-002) regarding the three challenges faced by giftedness researchers. Questions are posed for the original authors. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

Introduces the current issue of High Ability Studies, which will mark the premiere of an exceptional format for presenting and discussing new ideas: A target article and peer commentaries. The editorial provides information on submission of electronic manuscripts, and overviews the articles appearing in the current issue of the journal which cover topics including WICS as a model for giftedness, emotional and behavioural adjustment of the gifted, and career orientations of gifted early adolescent girls. In addition, the editorial previews the content of the upcoming issue of High Ability Studies. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

On the basis of findings from the expertise research, the authors discuss 3 reasons for the deficits of giftedness research in the field of vocational training: the emphasis put on general giftedness factors and the insufficient attention paid to the domain specificity of exceptional performances and to the course of expertise development. As a consequence, a giftedness model is suggested that combines the traditions of giftedness research with those of expertise research. In addition to a person's internal performance dispositions, favorable personality characteristics, and environmental features, the authors primarily focus on the active learning process where domain-specific expertise is acquired. Consequences for practical diagnosis and the advancement of gifted persons in the vocational area are considered. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

In this contribution ENTER will be used as a basis to determine which traits can be used to characterize identifications within the conceptual framework of the Actiotope Model of Giftedness. In contrast to alternative conceptions of giftedness this model employs a systemic approach which does not emphasize the identification of persons, but rather the identification of a learning path which leads to excellence. Following a brief overview of ENTER and the Actiotope Model of Giftedness, information pertinent for each step of ENTER will be specified. In conclusion a critical discussion of practical applications based on ENTER will be conducted. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Over the past few decades, systemic thinking has gained in popularity in developmental and learning sciences. The trend has, however, shown up in gifted education research only occasionally. The aim of this article is to introduce systemic thinking to the field of giftedness and explore possibilities for its application. In the first part, a definition of a system is provided and basic concepts of systemic thinking are introduced. In the second part, a full-fledged systemic model is introduced, the actiotope model of giftedness. In the third part, implications for gifted education are elaborated. In the discussion, the authors explain (a) how systemic thinking can make a valuable contribution to gifted education, (b) why systemic thinking will complement rather than replace current approaches to gifted education, and (c) the necessity of combining systemic thinking with other empirically testable theories. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Traditionally, in giftedness research, the intelligence quotient has been presumed to be the best predictor of high achievement levels. From the perspective of the Actiotope Model of Giftedness, however, it is merely one indicator among several on the effectiveness of the academic action repertoire. In this model, learning is considered to be more important than personal traits for attaining high levels of achievement. This is confirmed with three studies conducted with pupils in grades 8 through 11. In Study 1 it was shown that high achieving pupils in the subject of mathematics can be differentiated from other pupils according to the learning orientation of their subjective action space. High achievement can be better predicted over a temporal distance of six months through the learning orientation of the subjective action space than through intelligence. This finding was replicated in Study 2 for the scholastic subject of biology. In Study 3, an investigation was undertaken to determine whether the performance enhancing effect of a learning oriented subjective action space is also beneficial in coming to terms with experiences of failure. This premise could also be confirmed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Reply by the current authors to the comments made on the original article (see record 2012-16824-002). The commentaries to our target article Towards a systemic theory of gifted education differed in their assessments of the various arguments we put forward. Of the more than 40 responses to our target article, 27 responses were chosen as being representative of all commentaries. We grouped the responses according to the main points in our target article, including our claims that current approaches to gifted education are ineffective, current models of giftedness are generally flawed, and systemic models of giftedness represent an advancement in the way that giftedness can be understood. Next, we outlined a systems approach to gifted education, based on the actiotope model of giftedness as its theoretical foundation. Finally, we argued that the systemic theory of gifted education represents a paradigm shift in the way we view the development of exceptionality. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

In this target article, we argue that current approaches to gifted education are based on the erroneous view that to understand the development of exceptionality we need to understand firstly the components of giftedness, including cognitive such as intelligence and non-cognitive factors such as motivation. In contrast, systemic approaches to understanding exceptionality focuses on the interactions of these components where it is important to firstly understand the system that leads to exceptionality before it is possible to understand its components. After analyzing the weaknesses of current approaches to gifted education we then present three central arguments for the need for a paradigm shift. This is followed by an introduction of constructs of a systemic approach of gifted education. Using the Actiotope Model of Giftedness to understand the development of exceptionality, this article describes the basic principles of a gifted education that is based on this systemic approach. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

This commentary addresses Subotnik et al.’s (see record 2012-24309-002) target article from the perspective of researchers active in the field of giftedness. First, we self-critically examine the current standing of giftedness research within the scientific community. Second, the authors’ critique of gifted education is sharpened in three respects: (a) gifted identification, (b) effectiveness of gifted education, and (c) credentials of gifted education. Finally, four necessary and productive lines for future research are proposed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

Recent handbooks of giftedness or expertise propose a plethora of conceptions on the development of excellent performance but, to our knowledge, there are no comparative studies that provide empirical evidence of their validity to guide researchers and practitioners in their adoption of a particular conception. This study sought to close that gap by conducting an empirical comparison of the major approaches to giftedness and expertise currently in use: the IQ model, the performance model, the moderator model, and the systemic model. The four models were tested in a longitudinal study with a sample of N = 350 German students attending university preparatory schools; 25% of the sample had been assigned to special classes for the gifted. The construct and predictive validity of the four models were tested by means of structural equation modeling. Theoretical considerations along with our results indicated a differentiation among the models whereby some could only predict while others could also explain the emergence of excellent performance and thereby yield valuable information for the design of interventions. The empirical comparison of the approaches showed that they were unequally suited for the two challenges. For prediction purposes, the performance approach proved best while, for explanations, the moderator and systemic approaches were the most promising candidates. Even so, the latter did demonstrate conceptual and/or methodological problems. The IQ approach was superseded by the other approaches on both prediction and explanation. Implications and limitations of the findings are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

The authors introduce readers to quantitative text analysis and its potential for analyzing text-based nonreactive measures as a means of broadening the evidential basis within research on giftedness and talent. After defining quantitative text analysis and describing how it can augment survey studies for analyses at individual and cultural levels, the special potential of quantitative text analysis for addressing cultural questions within gifted and talented research is described. Inductive and deductive techniques of quantitative text analysis are then introduced and illustrated with brief examples drawn from gifted and talented research. Finally, a brief illustrative study is presented via an extended series of linked worked examples focusing on the question of the place of giftedness and talent within mentoring discourse in US mass media of past and present in order to illustrate in more detail how quantitative text analysis can be used to improve the culture-level evidence base within gifted and talented education. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

This special issue of High Ability Studies is devoted to contexts that support talent development. While numerous conceptions of giftedness consider the role played by the environment for talent development, most of these conceptions nevertheless viewed giftedness itself as an individual attribute. Newer approaches have, however, begun to fundamentally alter this view: The environment and learning contexts are not only important for talent development, but they also make up an integral part of what giftedness actually is. Plucker and Barab (2005), for example, have called for investigating “gifted transactions” (p. 210) rather than gifted individuals. In a similar vein, Ziegler (2005) defined giftedness as the property of a system made up of the individual and his or her environment. The articles assembled in this special issue emphasize different perspectives of the relevance of learning environments. The first three contributions present empirical studies on the relevance of learning contexts in general and in different cultural settings. The following two articles discuss important implications of current research for the establishment of supportive learning contexts at school. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

The aim of these studies was to gain insight into math and physics teachers' implicit personality theories (IPTs) regarding gender-specific talent and motivation. The studies used C. S. Dweck's Motivation Process model for theoretic background. The goal of Study 1 was to explore the areas in which gender-role-specific thinking existed among 70 math teachers in a German Gymnasium, as well as the extent to which it existed. Study 2 replicated Study 1, with 44 physics teachers. The teachers, as expressed by their IPTs of intelligence and learning-goal orientation, saw no gender differences. However, physics teachers awarded boys a higher performance goal orientation but seemed to assume that this was accompanied by a strong work avoidance attitude. Contrary to expectations, no relationships could be substantiated between the teachers' perceptions of pupils' motivational orientations and their reference-norm orientation, for which also no gender-specific cognitions could be proven. Sometimes gender-related points of view appeared very distinctly in both the math teacher and physics teacher samples. Sometimes though, no attitudes of this type could be isolated and, in some areas, they were detected only in contradictory statements. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

Females are still underrepresented in mathematics and the sciences. Recent attempts at explanations assume that the main reason for this fact are motivational differences between the genders determined by the socialization process. In 2 studies the authors measured implicit theories of mathematics and physics teachers on gender-specific giftedness and motivation. A significant part of the teachers still holds to gender related views. 26.5 % of the mathematics and 30.4 % of the physics teachers thought that in their subjects boys were more gifted than girls. Further differences were shown in the kind of further education the teachers would advise their male and female students to take up. Whereas they would suggest the girls careers in education, medicine or philology, they thought that the boys were better suited for the mathematical, scientific, engineering or technology areas. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

At the outset of the chapter, it is pointed out that the concepts of gifts and talents have their origins in mythology, theology, and metaphysics. The main reason for their adoption into science was the compulsion to find explanatory concepts for the phenomenon that some persons attain a level of efficiency in a specific domain that normally cannot be achieved, even with extreme learning efforts and the best of support. To explain this phenomenon, the Actiotope Model of Giftedness places the focus on the actions of an individual and their evolution. The development of excellence is understood as an adaptation of a dynamic system, which intensifies in complexity through interactions with the objective structure of a domain, whereby with increasing excellence, the individual will also increasingly effect changes in the objective structure of the domain itself. This chapter also considers the coadaptation and coevolution of the components of the Actiotope, such as the action repertoire and its determinants, goals, subjective action space, and environment, as well as the interaction of these components within a network. Gifts and talents, which are traditionally understood as attributes of an individual, therefore, have several mothers and fathers. It is now time to recognize them by their true names. It is also time to give their talented children the chance to attain excellence by providing them with an individually tailored promotion of their entire Actiotope. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: create)

This editorial discusses the identification of effective learning environments. Leading models of expertise development and giftedness have placed environmental factors as fundamentally important for understanding attainment. This special issue of Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling highlights the diversity of approaches used by researchers who have examined optimal environments for learning and achievement and the various influences of different forms of educational and learning capital. It is hoped that the papers featured in this special issue will enhance the knowledge of its readers in the field of educational and learning capital. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

Based on the Actiotope Model of Giftedness, this article introduces a learning-resource-oriented approach for gifted education. It provides a comprehensive categorization of learning resources, including five exogenous learning resources termed educational capital and five endogenous learning resources termed learning capital. Evidence from the literature is presented that supports the validity of each of the categories. Finally, 12 implications of a learning resource orientation for gifted education are discussed in relation to four areas: gifted education orientations, gifted identification, gifted education principles, and gifted learning resources management. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)