Su búsqueda

This article presents an analysis of patterns of giftedness based on the triarchic theory of intelligence. The analysis distinguishes among seven different patterns of giftedness, each involving a different combination of analytical, creative, and practical abilities. The seven patterns are the Analyzer, the Creator, the Practitioner, the Analytical Creator the Analytical Practitioner, the Creative Practitioner, and the Consummate Balancer. Examples are given of each pattern and the strengths and weaknesses of each pattern are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

Comments on the debate between R. Jarrell and J. Borland (1980) and J. Renzulli (1986) over the concept of giftedness and presents 3 criteria for a "good" definition of this concept. The debate over giftedness is recast in terms of these criteria. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

In this article, I describe the 21 ideas underlying a 42-year search to understand giftedness. I present the ideas roughly chronologically, in the order in which they arose, and discuss how in a career as in science, progress means supplementing or even superseding one idea with the next. In terms of the 21 ideas, I start with a discussion of how I thought IQ tests could account for giftedness and end with a discussion of the ACCEL (Active Concerned Citizenship and Ethical Leadership) model. But I frame the article in terms of a paradox—that despite the fact that IQs rose 30 points during the 20th century, people often seem to be operating at an intellectual level that is not notably higher and may even be lower in some respects than in previous times. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

This article introduces the construct of personal talent curation. Personal talent curation is one’s assessment of one’s talents—of one’s strengths and weaknesses—but also the building of an adaptive match in life between those talents and both one’s career pursuits and one’s personal lifestyle. Sometimes, this match means pursuing a lifelong passion, but other times, it means giving up that passion or transforming it into a passion that works in the broader context of the life one seeks for oneself. For example, one may be an exceptionally talented musician, scientist, or artist, but the concomitants of a life building relentlessly on those talents—competition, professional jealousy, and continual critiques—just do not fit the kind of life one wishes to lead. In such cases, it may turn out that what in a profession or in society is viewed as a “failure” or a “derailment” may represent a personal adaptive success. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Comments on an article by Scott J. Peters (see record 2022-20183-002). Peters has made excellent suggestions for how to increase diversity and equitable representation in identification of gifted children. His approach, however, is based on current models of what constitutes “giftedness.” This approach is incomplete and, taken on its own, perhaps suboptimal. I would suggest a complementary approach. We need to start taking seriously the need to identify and nurture the fully transformationally gifted. Nurturing them means presenting gifted children not just with academic problems that have little relevance to the life problems they will need to solve later, but also presenting them with problems that are ecologically valid, such as problems of how to deal with the challenges the world is facing today. It’s nice to excel transactionally; it’s better to excel by making a positive, meaningful, and potentially enduring difference to the world—to make the world a better place. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

The late James Flynn, to whom this Special Issue is dedicated, suggested that what will matter most to the future of the world is not levels of intelligence but rather how intelligence is deployed. In this article, I argue that we can distinguish between transactional and transformational deployments of intelligence. Loosely following Flynn, I suggest that we need to pay much more attention to the latter rather than the former. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

In this article, I discuss the application of an augmented theory of successful intelligence to identification, teaching, and assessment of the gifted in STEM disciplines. The theory holds that giftedness in STEM (as well as in other fields) can be understood in terms of an integration of creative, analytical, practical, and wisdom-based skills. First, I introduce the general issues underlying the article. Then, I discuss the relevance of the theory to identification. Next, I consider issues relevant to teaching the gifted in STEM disciplines. Finally, I draw some conclusions regarding the teaching of the gifted in STEM. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Is there an ethical giftedness, and if so, what does it look like? In this article, I consider why ethical behavior is much harder to come by than one would expect. Ethically gifted individuals are able to complete a series of eight steps to action, the failure of any one of which may result in a person, even one who is ethically well trained, to act in a manner that lacks the translation of ethical knowledge into action. Wise people are those who use their abilities for a common good as determined by positive ethical values. Many people identified as gifted through traditional means are nevertheless lacking in ethical gifts, in part because socialization may not reward them for the development of ethical patterns of behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Different cultures have different conceptions of what it means to be gifted. But in identifying children as gifted, we often use only our own conception, ignoring the cultural context in which the children grew up. Such identification is inadequate and fails to do justice to the richness of the world's cultures. It also misses children who are gifted and may identify as gifted children those who are not. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Discusses decisions individuals can make to be creative in their lives, and provides examples and activities for teaching creativity. To a large extent, creativity is a decision. Ten characteristics of people who decide for creativity are as follows: (1) they redefine problems by taking a problem that most people see in 1 way and allow themselves to see it in another way; (2) they analyze their own ideas by being the 1st to decide whether the ideas are really worth pursuing; (3) they sell their ideas, because creative ideas challenge existing ways of doing things; (4) they are knowledgeable, but recognize that knowledge can also impede creativity; (5) they surmount obstacles, because creative people defy the crowd; (6) they are willing to take sensible risks; (7) they are willing to grow by not fighting new ideas that threaten their ideas; (8) they believe in themselves; (9) they tolerate ambiguity long enough to get their ideas right; and (10) they find what they love to do and do it, because people are at their most creative when they are doing what they love to do. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Argues that intelligence seems to consist in large part of the ability to deal with nonentrenched tasks and concepts, but this ability seems only to be peripherally measured by current tests of intelligence. This view brings the concept of intelligence closer to that of creativity, as usually conceived, but still maintains the distinction between convergent and divergent thinking that has traditionally characterized the difference between what is measured in intelligence tests and what is measured in creativity tests. Examples of nonentrenchment in the assessment of intellectual giftedness are provided. (15 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

presents a pentagonal implicit theory of giftedness and a set of data testing the theory / discuss what an implicit theory is and why such theories are important / describe the pentagonal theory, specifying 5 conditions claimed to be individually necessary and jointly sufficient for a person to be labelled as gifted [excellence, rarity, productivity, demonstrability, and value criteria] / consider the relation of the pentagonal theory to explicit theories of giftedness / present data supporting the theory / discuss some implications of the pentagonal theory for gifted education (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

The general goal of this book is to present a new, "triarchic" theory of human intelligence. I believe the theory goes beyond many previous theories in its scope and answers a broader array of questions about intelligence than has been answered in the past by most single theories, including my own former componential theory. Indeed, the theory is to some extent an outgrowth of the componential theory: That theory is now one of three subtheories that comprise the triarchic theory. The first subtheory, a contextual subtheory, specifies how intelligent behavior is defined in large part by the sociocultural context in which this behavior takes place. The second subtheory, an experiential subtheory, posits that for a given task or situation, contextually appropriate behavior is not equally "intelligent" at all points along the continuum of experience with that behavior or class of behaviors. . . . The same holds true for situations. The third subtheory, a componential subtheory, specifies the structures and mechanisms that underlie intelligent behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: preface)

In this chapter, I present a theory of giftedness that emphasizes that giftedness should be defined not just in terms of general-intellectual skills, as it has been in the past, but in terms of adaptive-intellectual skills—a person’s ability to make a positive, meaningful, and potentially enduring difference to the world. People who are adaptively intelligent not only are “smart” in a traditional sense, but they also have the skills to become active engaged citizens and ethical leaders. I discuss the theory, the research, and the implications of the work for gifted identification and instruction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: book)

The WICS model is a possible common basis for identifying gifted individuals (Sternberg, 2003c). WICS is an acronym standing for Wisdom, Intelligence, Creativity, Synthesized. According to this model, wisdom, intelligence, and creativity are sine qua nons for the gifted leaders of the future. Without a synthesis of these three attributes, someone can be a decent contributor to society, and perhaps even a good one, but never a great one. In the remainder of this chapter, each of these attributes is discussed, although for didactic purposes, they are not discussed in the order in which they are stated in the acronym. The discussion starts with intelligence, which is a basis for creativity and wisdom and so should be discussed first. Then, creativity is discussed, which is essential in wisdom, as well. Finally, wisdom is discussed, which builds on but goes beyond intelligence and creativity. Then, methods are described for measuring the attributes. Finally, some general conclusions are drawn. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: create)

This article presents a pentagonal implicit theory of giftedness and a set of data testing the theory. The exposition is divided into five parts. First, we discuss what an implicit theory is and why such theories are important. Second, we describe the pentagonal theory, specifying five conditions claimed to be individually necessary and jointly sufficient for a person to be labeled as gifted. These conditions help us understand not only why some people are labeled as gifted but also why some others are not. Third, we consider the relation of the pentagonal theory to explicit theories of giftedness. Fourth, we present data supporting the theory. Finally, we discuss some implications of the pentagonal theory for gifted education. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

This chapter reviews the previous chapters in the book and identifies points of agreement and disagreement among authors. The greatest point of agreement is that those wishing to identify and develop giftedness in young people need to go beyond IQ in their conception of what it means to be gifted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: book)

The essays in this special issue of Gifted Education International focus on issues in the terminology of the gifted field, especially the terms “gifted” and “giftedness” themselves. We summarize the contributors' arguments and propose ten common themes that emerge from the essays: 1. Be clear about what terms actually mean. 2. Promote giftedness as being about maximizing opportunity, not elitism. 3. Achieve equity so that all have equal opportunities. 4. If you identify individuals as “gifted,” use multiple and diverse measures. 5. Move beyond IQ and other narrow constructs. 6. Giftedness is dynamic, not just a permanent state. Who is gifted and how they are gifted can change over time and sociocultural and other contexts. 7. Motivation to achieve and to make a difference is more important than static abilities. 8. What matters is what you achieve, not just what you could achieve. 9. Focus on achieving a collective or common good. 10. Focus on instruction to help maximize on potential, not on identification. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Gifts can be individually, dyadically, or collectively chosen and oriented. Society, in its identification of the gifted, has chosen to focus on individual and sometimes dyadic goods. This practice represents a culture of individualism, but it has become solipsistic. We argue that identification instead should focus on those most likely to help to achieve a collective common good—who will bestow on others, gifts that are broadly beneficial especially to those most in need of help. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)