Su búsqueda

Discusses issues related to the theory, methods, and validity of cognition research and its approach to the understanding of intelligence and giftedness. Previous research issues, including ecological validity, and current approaches, including metacognition, structural learning, and developmental and Piagetian studies are described. It is concluded that metacognitive research will lead to new meanings of giftedness in cognitive and academic terms. (23 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

Bruce M. Shore’s research contributions in gifted education have focused on three contexts that impact how giftedness is understood and the instructional environments that serve gifted learners’ educational needs. This article describes these contributions and provides selected examples plus a more complete Supplemental Online bibliography. First, giftedness benefits from being conceptualized in terms of theories that address the development of expertise. Featured expert– gifted parallels include interconnectedness of knowledge, metacognitive processes, perspective taking, active learner roles, affinity for novelty and complexity, and task representation and planning. Illustrative research is described from preschool age through higher education, including connections to creativity research. Second, gifted education benefits when guided by social-constructivist theory of education and its expression in inquiry-based instruction. Examples include building upon learner interests, question asking, collaborative inquiry, and active learner roles. Desirable specific instructional practices are framed by the above theories and by being considered in the contexts of widely recommended and best practices with their research support. Third, gifted education, at all levels including higher education and teacher education, needs to be an integral part of the context of general education. Most specific gifted education practices also work in general education, including learning high-level skills within subject matter. Nineteen examples are cited about how gifted education contributes to the quality of general education. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

For some three decades psychologists and educators have been working with incomplete or outdated ideas of what constitutes giftedness. Conceptual leadership in the field has moved from a definition based on IQ to expertise- and cognitive science-based definitions. Practice lags behind. Similarly, curriculum concepts are changing to foci based on thinking processes and cognitive apprenticeships, communities of learners, teachers and students as coconstructors of curriculum, and inquiry skills and knowledge as explicit parts of the objectives. Practice there also lags behind, but the shift is underway. This discussion elaborates on these two evolving phenomena, illustrated especially by studies completed and underway in the author’s laboratory group at McGill. It juxtaposes central ideas in gifted education, expertise, and inquiry-driven teaching and learning, and illustrates how these strands can come together for the benefit of all students—albeit sometimes in different ways. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Discusses the important qualities required of teachers of gifted children, as well as new teacher training strategies. Particular attention is given to professional training norms established by the Professional Training Institute of the National Association for Gifted Children (US). Critical remarks are also made concerning the risks of overly restrictive research programs related to giftedness. (5 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

A mathematical set-breaking task was used to examine the cognitive flexibility and planning of 19 school-identified gifted students and 11 average students in Grades 5 and 6. Gifted Ss tended to have more metacognitive knowledge (MCK) than average Ss regardless of problem-solving speed, and gifted Ss who were faster at problem solving had more MCK than gifted Ss who were slower. These intra- and intergroup differences may be useful in understanding the nature of giftedness and the ways in which gifted students' thinking differs from that of others. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)

Reports an error in the original article by A. Dover and B. M. Shore ( Gifted Child Quarterly, 1991[Spr], Vol 35[2], 99–205). The water-jar quantities for Problems 6 and 7 in Table 1 were inadvertently reversed. The correct quantities for these trials are provided. (The following abstract of this article originally appeared in PA, Vol 78:27007.) A mathematical set-breaking task was used to examine the cognitive flexibility and planning of 19 school-identified gifted students and 11 average students in Grades 5 and 6. Gifted Ss tended to have more metacognitive knowledge (MCK) than average Ss regardless of problem-solving speed, and gifted Ss who were faster at problem solving had more MCK than gifted Ss who were slower. These intra- and intergroup differences may be useful in understanding the nature of giftedness and the ways in which gifted students' thinking differs from that of others. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)

Discusses research on the relation of metacognition to giftedness. At Yale University, R. J. Sternberg (1980, 1983, 1984, 1985) and his colleagues have developed an original "triarchic" theory of intelligence and a subtheory of insight. It is maintained that interactions among the elements of the triarchic theory explain giftedness. The question of whether giftedness is a subset of intelligence or vice versa remains controversial. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)

The social and cognitive phenomena associated with theory of mind (ToM) and research on the social and cognitive qualities of giftedness have not been sufficiently connected. The common focus areas for ToM researchers (e.g., false-belief understanding, deception, and autism) should be of interest to gifted education research because these are interesting conceptualizations that could be helpful in better understanding gifted children’s social interactions and friendships, and provide some guidance in classroom grouping. Except in a few studies, for example of perspective taking, ToM research has not studied identified gifted children. Perhaps this is because giftedness is usually formally assessed after the developmental periods at which it is typically studied. Including gifted children (academically, creatively, or otherwise) might help broaden the understanding of ToM variables and ensure that the key tasks do not have ceiling effects. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

The concept of giftedness has historically been shaped by theories of IQ, creativity, and expertise (including early conceptions of metacognition). These theories focus within the mind of the individual learner. Social, emotional, and motivational qualities of giftedness were treated as add-ons, not part of the core construct. This created misalignment with the social construction of knowledge—a position widely supported in gifted education practice. Newer, broader conceptions of metacognitive, self-regulated, and self-regulated learning processes have garnered interest. However, because these theories borrowed language from each other and earlier theories, assigning new meanings to old constructs, confusion arose about how to distinguish each of these three theories from each other or apply them to instruction. This article distinguishes among metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning, relating each to notions of giftedness, highlighting implications for practice, and especially highlighting self-regulated learning as a valuable contributor to understanding giftedness and designing instruction in gifted education. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

The giftedness and career-choice literatures have traditionally spoken in different terms about the same phenomenon, multipotentiality. Multipotentialed individuals have numerous and diverse abilities and interests. Appropriate interventions are necessary to help them cope successfully with the abundance of career choices available to them. This review links the giftedness and career-choice literatures through a discussion of the concept of multipotentiality and explores ensuing practical implications and challenges to the overall idea. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)