Su búsqueda
Resultados 28 recursos
-
The topic of friendships has recurred across decades in the giftedness literature. This chapter briefly recounts existing sources about gifted friendships, the evidence the authors and their collaborators have collected on the issue of different numbers, types, and patterns of pillars supporting stable and quality gifted friendships, actual and preferred numbers of friends, the qualities they look for in a friend, and add new information that especially covers the transition from secondary school to university for gifted youth and parallel information for university-age gifted learners. This data potentially guides and expands some of our understanding of gifted friendships including how and why they might be structured somewhat uniquely. The chapter then examines two mostly secondary sources, topical books about giftedness or gifted children and prior major handbooks on giftedness. The relatively small number of references reflects the fact that most of the literature has focused on intellectual, cognitive, academic or general social development of gifted individuals, parenting, teaching, underachievement, and not friendships specifically. Within the sources the authors have cited, a researcher or practitioner will be readily directed to primary sources and full details of the studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)
-
Borrows from the field of cognitive psychology to illustrate the use of protocols to understand giftedness and high level thinking during problem solving in an advanced secondary school physics course, and in how mothers interacted with their preschoolers in ways that might help build on their problem solving skills while carrying out a building task with blocks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: create)
-
One of the controversies in the field with a history of conflicting findings concerns whether or not giftedness leads to a preference for independent study. The authors provide a comprehensive review of the literature on this topic, describing a study they have recently completed, and reporting on their nuanced findings. They conclude that it is really a question of 'match': when exceptionally capable learners do not feel supported, they prefer to learn alone, but when they are in situations that facilitate their learning goals, they can thrive in mixed groups. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: book)
-
We wanted a catchy title for this potentially pedantic topic, but now that we may have one, it probably needs to be explained. Why “double Slinky phenomenon”? A Slinky is a coiled steel spring that “walks” when the top end is pulled down from the first to the second of a series of stairs or the top part of a ramp, then the trailing part leap-frogs to the third step or lower down the inclined plane, and so on. With two Slinkys working their way down, the progress was mostly but not entirely smooth or predictable, and one or the other would pull ahead or fall behind. Sometimes the two might even contact each other. Now let’s name one Slinky “gifted education” and the other “general education” and send them on their way. This is the visual image we want to create for our narrative. Dual Slinkys, unevenly making their way along, only sometimes in synchrony even though they were made in the same factory. The analogy is imperfect, especially because education is an uphill rather than downhill enterprise, and not in a straight line, but we hope the image can remain in mind as we get to the main point of the chapter. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)
-
Addresses issues surrounding giftedness and exceptional talent (G/ET) in the cognitive or intellectual domain during infancy. The authors are writing as developmental psychologists with a research focus on early cognition. The extant literature on the prediction of cognitive and intellectual status from infancy is reviewed. By reviewing some of the traditional approaches for studying early manifestations of G/ET, the authors aim to turn readers' attention to current approaches to developmental causation. It is argued that these approaches provide a more accurate account of developmental processes and determinants than the traditional nature–nurture dichotomy. Furthermore, these approaches call for consideration of developmental course in the empirical investigation of emergent phenomena, and that the future of research on the development of G/ET will require an intensive longitudinal approach. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)
-
Connects creativity with recent research and theory on cognition and metacognition. More specifically, the authors highlight some common processes used by creative people and individuals of high cognitive ability, and show how these commonalties can reshape conceptions of optimal mind development. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)
-
explore thinking processes as an important component of a contemporary conception of giftedness and its development / address four issues related to thinking processes and giftedness: first, some of the principal ways in which the thinking processes of gifted persons differ from those of other people, with a focus on recent and ongoing research into cognitive processes; second, . . . evidence to link the intellectual performance of very young children to the higher level thinking observed in older children and in adults; third, and briefly, the nature and success of programs intended to train people to think in these ways and thereby to enhance their intellectual abilities; and fourth, some concluding thoughts about broader educational implications (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)
-
The Internet is generally a positive development. There are, however, serious risks to the general population. Getnetwise.org lists a number of important types of risks that are available to children. We posit that the highest risks for children are among the following: Exposure to inappropriate material, meeting dangerous strangers, harassment, power without accountability, anonymity, gender-swapping, and loss of personality. Are the gifted at any greater risk? No one knows for sure, but it is possible that some proportion of the gifted may be at greater risk than others. Who are the risky gifted? We define the risky gifted as that portion of the gifted population who may be at greater risk of danger on the Internet, possibly even as a result of their giftedness. Among the gifted who may be more at risk are those who are more curious, energetic, or imaginative. If so, they may be more exploratory, more prone to intellectual risk taking, more sensitive, and more affected by tragedy. Internet risks to children in general are now receiving mainstream attention (Jackson, von Eye, & Biocca, 2003). The particular characteristics of many gifted children invite us to speculate about curiosity or inquiry driven activity using the Internet. Let us consider several of these possible risks in more detail. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: create)
Explorar
Tipo de recurso
- Book Section (18)
- Journal Article (10)
Año de publicación
-
Entre 1900 y 1999
(8)
- Entre 1980 y 1989 (3)
- Entre 1990 y 1999 (5)
-
Entre 2000 y 2026
(20)
- Entre 2000 y 2009 (13)
- Entre 2010 y 2019 (6)
-
Entre 2020 y 2026
(1)
- 2021 (1)