Su búsqueda

Why are Nobel laureates so innovative? Although the capacity of Nobel laureates for scientific innovation has attracted researchers' attention for decades, the phenomenon is far from understood. This chapter argues that scientific innovation of Nobel laureates is determined in part by specific preferences, feelings, beliefs, and intuitive processes, which constitute a whole field of unexplored or poorly understood scientific phenomena. Based on autobiographical and biographical accounts of Nobel laureates, the chapter explores these phenomena, demonstrating that they predict scientific productivity of the highest level that results in innovations and, consequently, outstanding scientific talent of Nobel caliber. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

Research shows that social circumstances influence the development of an individual's high abilities. This paper identifies the micro-social1 factors in the development of entrepreneurial giftedness. Specifically, the paper considers the family milieu, 'significant others' and great contemporaries in the case of Richard Branson, the most successful entrepreneur in the UK. Despite the quite evident importance of entrepreneurship in the prosperity of any society, one should acknowledge that the phenomenon of entrepreneurial giftedness is terra incognita from a research viewpoint. The paper introduces the concept of entrepreneurial giftedness and thus fills an apparent niche in the literature on high abilities. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

This article proposes a new approach to the psychological assessment of potential intellectually-creative abilities of the gifted based on the new cognitive-developmental theory of giftedness developed by the author. The major limitations of conventional intelligence tests are shortly analyzed. The nine methodological and procedural principles, which constitute this approach, are presented along with the examples of new intelligence tests. The principles state that new intelligence tests should first of all examine the psychological mental context generated by gifted individuals themselves. These tests should have an "open character," evaluate the basis of giftedness (not its numerous traits or manifestations), and allow both retrospective and prospective assessment. New tests should not evaluate psychological functions/processes (e.g., attention or memory) and mental speed, and they should not be very long or time-consuming. Cognitive styles, metacognitive and extracognitive abilities should also be assessed. Child's sensitive periods--which form the developmental foundation of giftedness--should be examined as well. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Comments on the article by Ericsson, Roring and Nandagopal (see record 2007-12554-002). This paper presented well the achievements of the expert performance approach. The 10-year rule of expertise is one of them, a very practical rule. For example, when I meet a new physician, my first question always is: 'How many years of practical experience do you have?' 'Do not send me a bunch of non-experts to see my baby. Send me a paediatrician who has at least 10 years of experience', I demanded the administration of the Children's Hospital in Ottawa and forbade non-experts to enter my room. They promised to send me their best expert. The following morning Dr. Johnson came, saying that he had five years of experience and he thought that he was an expert. You can imagine my disappointment. However, the expert performance approach does not answer some important questions directly arising out of its main statements. The author expands upon these issues. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

People of exceptionally high ability remain an extremely important source of cultural innovation and renewal. By "high ability," we mean exceptional human abilities referred to by terms like giftedness, talent, creativity, genius, child prodigies, innovation, and wisdom. Extracognitive facets play an essential role in the development and expression of exceptional achievement. Extracognitive facets are those that go beyond cognition. In other words, they concern those facets of intelligence that are not captured by many traditional accounts of giftedness or expertise. These include various feelings (e.g., feeling of beauty), temperament, and institutional and cultural influences critical to developing high ability. The history of psychology has at least two long-established research traditions that aim to study extracognitive facets in high ability: the study of personality traits associated with high ability (the so-called personality trait approach1 in the psychology of giftedness and creativity) and the investigation of social factors facilitating the development of human talents. We review them briefly here to allow readers to situate our book with regard to these traditions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

In the context of this chapter, the phenomenon of the extracognitive refers to four interrelated components: specific intellectual feelings, specific intellectual beliefs, specific preferences and intellectual values, and intuitive processes. The following findings are a result of three different directions that our research has taken: the study of the extracognitive phenomenon in the case of Vladimir I. Vernadsky, a famous Russian scientist/genius of Nobel caliber; the study of this phenomenon in three intellectually gifted adolescents; and an investigation of the extracognitive phenomena in Nobel laureates. The chapter first deals with methodological issues related to the use of biographical and autobiographical literature as well as case-study approaches as a means of investigating the psychological underpinnings of gifted, creative, and talented individuals. The next parts present findings regarding the extracognitive phenomena of Vernadsky, gifted adolescents, and Nobel laureates, respectively. The chapter then considers the relationship between the components of the extracognitive, its link to metacognition, and its functions. Finally, the chapter concludes that the extracognitive should be viewed as the highest level of the manifestation of the intellectual and creative potentials of an individual, and consequently, as an important criterion of intellectually creative giftedness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

The Three-Ring Conception of Giftedness focuses on creative/innovative productivity, which differs from schoolhouse or lesson-learning giftedness. Giftedness that leads to innovation emerges from the interaction and overlap of three clusters of traits--well above average ability in a particular domain, task commitment, and creativity--and occurs in certain individuals, at certain times, under certain conditions. A broader conception of giftedness will allow researchers, theorists, and educators to more fully address, answer, and respond to the most pressing questions about where innovation 'comes from'. Simultaneously, this model, when applied, will assist in the development of individuals most capable of engaging in innovation and improving the quality of life for society. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

The relationship of creativity with high-level abilities varies from domain to domain. And just as creative skills often contribute to high-level performances, accomplishment can result from processes and capacities other than creativity. Creativity depends on originality; that is the only facet of creativity on which everyone agrees. Accomplishment and achievement, on the other hand, may reflect other problem-solving skills besides creative problem solving, including some that are more convergent than divergent. Accomplishment also involves persistence, Zeitgeist, and luck, as well as talent. In the remainder of this chapter I focus on creativity, keeping in mind what was just proposed about creativity sometimes being involved in accomplishment, and sometimes interacting with other kinds of abilities, but also recognizing that sometimes creativity is merely potential and unrelated to accomplishment and achievement. This view is consistent with several definitions of giftedness wherein creativity is one aspect of giftedness, and contributes to gifted-level performances, but at the same time can be separated from it. In this chapter I focus even further and explore the extracognitive bases of creativity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

The approach to wisdom proposed here starts with the construct of tacit knowledge about oneself, others, and situational contexts. An advantage of the proposed theory is that it is linked to a theory of intelligence (the triarchic one) at the same time that it makes explicit how wisdom is different from the triarchic (analytical, creative, and practical) aspects of intelligence as they typically are encountered. Although tacit knowledge is acquired within a domain, it more typically applies to a field. The balance theory of wisdom postulates that tacit knowledge underlying practical intelligence is applied to balance intrapersonal, interpersonal, and extrapersonal interests to achieve a balance of the responses to the environmental context of adaptation to, shaping of, and selection of environments in order to achieve a common good. Values mediate how people use their tacit knowledge in balancing interests and responses. In addition, the balance theory suggest a number of sources of developmental and individual differences in wisdom and giftedness. The chapter concludes by discussing both strengths and weaknesses of this theory of giftedness in wisdom. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

Five strategic steps posited here suggest a course of action that can lead to systemic and sustainable innovation in public-school music education: (1) reconcile perspectives regarding the purpose of music education; (2) establish a framework for comprehensive, interdisciplinary programs that are intended to benefit all children; (3) prepare advanced college-conservatory students to contribute to the development and sustainability of innovative programs as 'artist-teacher- scholars'; (4) form networks of college-conservatory, arts organization, and public school partnerships; and (5) explore and promote new conceptions of giftedness that result from the implementation of innovative forms of music education practices in public schools. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)