Su búsqueda

En autores o colaboradores
Año de publicación
  • The ImPACT aims to measure neurocognitive functioning in student athletes. Many schools administer preseason ImPACT assessments to determine athletes' baseline functioning. Follow-up ImPACT assessments are administered to athletes who sustain concussions to compare their pre- and post-injury functioning. Normative data may be used in place of individualized baseline scores if athletes were not administered baseline assessments. At the inception of this study, normative datasets consisted of scores from typically developing athletes. However, research suggests athletes of varying gender and exceptionality statuses perform differently on baseline ImPACT assessments. In particular, differences were found among male and female athletes as well as athletes with learning disabilities (LD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) when compared to control groups. Although some studies have suggested gifted and/or talented students may perform differently on ImPACT baseline assessments, no present study has directly examined this concept. The present study investigated baseline score differences between males and females and among students with LD, ADHD, giftedness, and typical development on the five composites of the ImPACT (Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, Visual Motor Speed, Reaction Time, Impulse Control). Findings of the present study revealed significant main effects of exceptionality status. Contrary to initial hypotheses, no significant main effects of gender were found. Additionally, no significant interaction effects were discovered. Follow-up analyses revealed members of the Gifted group obtained significantly higher scores than members of the Control group on Verbal Memory and Visual Memory Composites. The importance of these findings, limitations of the study, and directions for future research are also discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

  • “Gifted or talented” is a student exceptionality category that in many states requires a formal eligibility procedure to qualify for specialized school programming (Gallagher et al. 2014). Researchers agree that there is a historical overreliance on IQ in determining service eligibility; however, no brief parent rating scale appears in the empirical literature to support the decision-making of school evaluation teams. Items of the Characteristics of Giftedness Scale (Silverman 1993) were selected and expanded upon to create a brief 20-item instrument. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed that the modified scale was best characterized as having a two-factor structure. Furthermore, group differences were found between students eligible for gifted school programming and those without gifted status at school. Taken together, present findings suggest that this modified scale may be a suitable evaluation tool for school-based use. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Última actualización de la base de datos: 4/10/26, 6:08 (CEST)

Explorar

Tipo de recurso