Su búsqueda

En autores o colaboradores
  • Giftedness and talent are central for understanding and fostering human potential and represent important and exciting research topics. In recent years, numerous new findings on these topics have appeared, some of them as systematic overviews in the form of literature reviews or meta-analyses. This book summarizes important new findings, results, and conceptions. It presents information on the identification and assessment of giftedness and talent and on special fostering options and programs in particular. The book concentrates on the core basics for entering the subject area and provides references to further literature, especially on topics that receive less attention in this book but are nevertheless of great relevance. It is useful for training educators and psychologists, for example, within a seminar. The book begins with the basic question of what giftedness is and how it relates to exceptional performance. It discusses the role that intelligence and creativity play in giftedness, and presents basic knowledge about both constructs. Furthermore, regarding the connection between giftedness and exceptional performance, the book offers a critical perspective on the respective contributions of the differential approach of giftedness research and of expertise research. It discusses three pioneering longitudinal studies with gifted students: the Terman Study and the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth from the USA and the Marburg Gifted Project from Germany. The book describes the relationship between intelligence and academic achievement, and distinguishes between implicit and explicit theories of giftedness, and the harmony and the disharmony hypothesis. It deals with how gifted students can be identified. Intelligence tests continue to play a central role here, and one will learn what to consider when selecting intelligence tests for giftedness diagnostics and about the problem of ceiling effects in many of the available test procedures. Finally, the book examines supporting gifted students in school and early childhood education. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

  • The level and profile of academic achievements affect students’ development in education and beyond. However, the utility of profile interpretation is a matter of debate and there is limited knowledge on the development of academic profiles. Conversely, for research of cognitive ability profiles, specifically differentiation processes, theories and statistical tools have already been developed. Taking advantage of the conceptual and theoretical framework as well as the methodological toolbox of differentiation research, we carried out two studies on academic profile formation. The academic achievement of Luxembourgish Students in German, French, and Math was assessed with standardized tests in both studies. Study 1 examined differentiation of academic achievement with longitudinal data of 1,848 students tested in Grades 5 and 7 ( M ageT1 = 10.62, SD ageT1 = 0.66). We found more balanced academic profiles with increasing achievement level, more balanced profiles with increasing grade level, and a stronger grade level effect for higher achieving students. Study 2 analyzed cross-sectional data from 5,235 Grade 9 students ( M age = 14.97, SD age = 1.04) who attended either an academic track or a vocational track to examine the effect of different educational contexts on differentiation. There were no substantial differences between the tracks regarding profile differentiation. The results overall indicate that academic profiles become more even over time, especially in high-achieving students. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract) Impact statementThis study finds that high-achieving students in Luxembourg scored more similarly on academic tests in different domains than low-achieving students, who had more pronounced strengths and weaknesses. Students in higher grades also scored more similarly than students in lower grades. This finding suggests that for older and higher-achieving students, the focus in school may be more on high performance in all domains than on exceptional performance in one specific domain. This is conducive to high grade point average, but may be problematic for domain-specific talent development, which requires specialization and a focus on individual strengths. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

Última actualización de la base de datos: 2/10/26, 5:50 (CEST)

Explorar

Tipo de recurso