Su búsqueda

The article presents an overview of important knowledge regarding metacognition and its relation to exceptional giftedness. Basic aspects of metacognition are defined and briefly described in accordance with the historical development and current notions of this construct. The following text deals with how much gifted children differ from typical population in particular aspects of metacognition (declarative, procedural, etc.). Part of the article is dedicated to a concise delimitation of exceptional giftedness, mainly in view of the shift in expert opinions concerning the nature of this construct: from the classic Terman's conception, in which giftedness was defined solely as based on exceptional results in standardized IQ tests, to more modern approaches, which take into account also other cognitive achievements, and to a certain extent even non-intellectual factors such as motivation or creativity. The next part of the study therefore focuses on the significance of metacognition for giftedness viewed as “developing expertise”, which is the conception associated mainly with R. Sternberg. Finally, there is an outline of some implications for assessment and for psycho-educational practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract) Resumen en idioma originalČlánek přináší přehled významných poznatků týkajících se metakognice a jejího vztahu k mimořádnému nadání. Vymezeny a stručně popsány jsou základní aspekty metakognice, v souladu s historickým vývojem i s aktuálním pojetím tohoto konstruktu. Následně se text zabývá tím, nakolik se podle reprezentativních zahraničních empirických výzkumů v jednotlivých aspektech metakognice (deklarativních, procedurálních aj.) odlišují nadané děti od běžné populace. Část článku je věnována i stručnému vymeze ní mimořádného nadání, zejména s ohledem na posun v odborných názorech na povahu tohoto konstruktu: od klasického Termanova pojetí, v němž bylo nadání definováno výhradně na základě mimořádných výsledků dosažených ve standardizovaných inteligenčních testech, k modernějším přístupům, které zohledňují i jiné kognitivní výkony a do jisté míry i mimointelektové faktory, jakými jsou motivace či tvořivost. Další část studie je proto zaměřena na význam metakognice pro nadání chápané jako „rozvíjející se expertnost“, což je pojetí spojené zejména se jménem R. Sternberga. Na závěr jsou shrnuty některé implikace pro diagnostiku a pedagogicko- psychologickou praxi. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

In this article, an overview of topics solved in the contemporary research on giftedness is presented. A selection of important theories of giftedness and the theory of deliberate practice are introduced, the significance and the origin of abilities, threshold level of giftedness and other factors are discussed. At the end, methods used in education of gifted and some examples of special educational programs are mentioned. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

The study brings first empirical experience with the diagnostic use of the Czech adaptation of the international method called Woodcock-Johnson International Edition (WJ IE COG, Ruef, Furman, Muñoz-Sandoval, 2006). It is a first standardised cognitive battery in the Czech Republic that has adopted Cattell-Horn-Carroll new internationally acknowledged hierarchical model of cognitive abilities. The method was applied to a research sample (N =118) of extraordinarily gifted individuals with and without dyslexia. The authors point out some important findings concerning especially issues of determining an appropriate criterion to identify giftedness in a group of gifted students and students with dyslexia. It shows that in case of this group of individuals it is impossible to derive the giftedness criterion only from the global IQ but it is necessary to analyse also wider factors of abilities or also abilities measured by the method themselves. themselves. Primary diagnostic attention needs to be paid particularly to the Thinking ability factor and Verbal ability factor. Performance in the so-called Cognitive efficiency factor may be significantly harmed by a learning disability. Moreover, the study also tries to compare the achieved performance profile in the given method in the examined groups of gifted probands with a performance profile of intellectually gifted students obtained by administering a more extensive American version of the test published recently. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Objectives: The aims of the present study were to (a) examine the effect of intellectual giftedness and the level of mathematical abilities on the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) and (b) compare two scoring systems used for ROCF. Sample and setting: The participants were 156 children (71 girls and 85 boys) of the third to fifth grades in elementary school, 49 of whom had been diagnosed as intellectually gifted before the research had started. Participants completed the Test for Identifications of Mathematical Giftedness (TIM) and copy, immediate recall and 15-minute delayed recall trials of the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure; the drawing procedure was constantly video recorded. Statistical analysis: Multiple linear regression and ordinal logistic regression were used to examine the effect of intellectual and mathematical giftedness on the ROCF scores depending on the type of the dependent variable—quantitative or qualitative ROCF scores. The effect of age and specific learning disabilities were analysed by regression analysis. Results: Intellectual giftedness and the level of mathematical abilities were moderately correlated with quantitative ROKF scores. According to these results, the authors recommend taking into account the intelligence effect while using the ROCF. On the other hand, they do not recommend using ROCF for diagnostics of intellectual and mathematical giftedness due to the small explained variances. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract) Resumen en idioma originalCíle: Cílem studie bylo prozkoumat vliv rozumového nadání a úrovně matematických schopností na kvantitativní a kvalitativní skóry Reyovy-Osterriethovy komplexní figury (ROKF). Vedlejším cílem bylo porovnat dva využité skórovací systémy pro ROKF. Výzkumný soubor a metoda: Data byla získána na souboru 156 žáků (71 dívek a 85 chlapců) z třetích až pátých ročníků základních škol, z nichž 49 dětí bylo před započetím výzkumu diagnostikováno jako rozumově nadaných. Všem byl zadán Test pro identifikaci nadaných žáků v matematice (TIM) a Reyova-Osterriethova komplexní figura—kopie, okamžitá reprodukce zpaměti a oddálená reprodukce zpaměti po 15 minutách, přičemž postup kresby byl vždy zaznamenáván na videokameru. Statistická analýza: Pro zjištění vlivu rozumového a matematického nadání na skóry ROKF byla použita lineární a ordinální logistická regrese v závislosti na typu závislé proměnné—kvantitativní či kvalitativní skóry ROKF. V modelech byl kontrolován vliv věku a specifických poruch učení. Výsledky: Rozumové nadání i úroveň matematických schopností středně silně souvisely s kvantitativními skóry ROKF. Na základě těchto výsledků autoři doporučují při použití ROKF brát ohled na souvislost příslušných skórů s inteligencí. Naopak nedoporučují používat ROKF k diagnostice rozumového či matematického nadání vzhledem k malému vysvětlenému rozptylu. Limity studie: Mezi limity studie patří málo jasná obsahová validita Testu pro identifikaci nadání v matematice a vysoký výskyt dětí s dvojí výjimečností ve výzkumném souboru. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

The study examines attitudes of teachers toward giftedness and education of gifted pupils. It shows that teachers can be divided into two groups (clusters). Those with a positive relationship toward giftedness and education of the gifted understand better the significance of giftedness for society and are less encumbered with myths and worries about elitism than teachers with generally negative attitudes toward giftedness. Creating a positive attitude toward this issue of problems is mostly related to one's own experience with the gifted. The relationship between attitudes and preferred forms of gifted education or a teacher's specialization has not been found. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop a new parental rating scale for identification of intellectually gifted preschoolers (4 to 6 years of age). This new scale, the Preschooler’s Ability Rating Scale (PARS), consists of two parts—PARS-PRE, which follows the principle of precocity and inquires about the age at which giftedness-relevant behavior appeared for the first time; and PARS-CUR, which focuses on the current level of abilities. Participants and setting: In total, 263 Czech mothers and 90 children participated in the main study. Hypotheses: PARS will have a two-dimensional structure corresponding to its two parts. Both parts will significantly correlate with scores on the Woodcock-Johnson: International edition II (WJ IE II COG).Statistical analysis. 1. Item analysis; 2. Exploratory factor analysis; 3. Correlational analyses with WJ IE II COG; 4. ROC analysis to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity. Results: Factor analysis suggests a three-factor structure—two of the factors correspond to the scale’s original parts, and the third factor reflects early reading and counting (4 items from the precocity part). The diagnostic accuracy of the first two factors is similarly low (r PRE = .33, r CUR = .25), but substantially higher for the early reading/counting factor (r LIT = .52). Addition-ally, parental ratings are, in general, based more on children’s verbal abilities than their nonverbal abilities. Given the low criterial validity, the authors do not recommend utilizing the PARS scale in practical setting, however, the conclusions are useful for further development of similarly-minded scales. Study limitations: Only 90 children were administered the WJ IE II COG—the small sample size affects the precision of parameter estimates. The parentsʼ sample consists only of mothers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract) Resumen en idioma originalCíle: Cílem studie bylo vytvoření nové posuzovací škály pro identifikaci nadaných předškoláků ve věku 4-6 let. Tato nová metoda, Preschooler’s Ability Rating Scale (PARS), má dvě části. První je PARS-PRE, která vychází z principu předčasné zralosti a její položky se zaměřují na věk, ve kterém rodiče poprvé pozorovali určité projevy chování, které mohou souviset s nadáním. Druhá je PARS-CUR, která se zaměřuje na aktuální úroveň schopností. Vzorek: Do hlavní části studie bylo zapojeno celkem 263 matek a 90 dětí z České republiky. Hypotézy: Posuzovací škála PARS bude mít dvoudimenzionální strukturu odpovídající jejím dvěma částem. Obě části budou silně korelovat se skóry baterie Woodcock-Johnson: International edition II (WJ IE II COG). Analýzy. 1. Položková analýza; 2. Explorační faktorová analýza; 3. Korelace s WJ IE II COG; 4. ROC analýza ke stanovení specificity a senzitivity. Výsledky: Výsledky faktorové analýzy naznačují třídimenzionální strukturu—dva faktory odpoví-dající dvěma částem škály a třetí faktor tvořený 4 položkami části PARS-PRE, které se zaměřují na časné čtení a počítání. Diagnostická přesnost dvou hlavních faktorů je srovnatelně nízká (r PRE = .33, r CUR = .25), výrazně vyšší je u třetího fak-toru (r LIT = .52). Dá se říci, že obecně je rodi-čovské hodnocení více založeno na verbálních schopnostech dítěte než na těch neverbálních. S ohledem na nízkou kriteriální validitu nelze doporučit škálu PARS pro využívání v praxi, závěry mohou být nicméně užitečné při vývoji podobně zaměřených nástrojů v budoucnu. Limity: Baterie WJ IE II COG byla administrována pouze 90 dětem—takto malý vzorek ovlivnil přesnost odhadu parametrů. Do rodičovské-ho hodnocení škálou PARS se zapojily pouze matky. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Objectives: The number of identified gifted children in Slovakia is small and Slovak psychologists need more modern and specialized assessment tools. Test for Identifying Gifted Children in Mathematics in Grades 3–5 (TIM3–5) is standardized in Czechia and has excellent psychometric properties with two parallel and fully equated forms. The study aims to adapt the test in the Slovak language and support its practical use. The authors ran a small pilot study using form A only and compared it to the Czech standardization sample. Sample and settings: The Slovak sample consisted of 169 pupils from four elementary schools and was supplemented by the Czech standardization sample (404 children in form A). The Slovak data were collected in February 2022; informed consent from the parents/legal guardians was obtained before data collection with approx. 40 % drop-out. The original authors of the test provided the Czech data collected in 2015. Hypotheses and analysis: The authors compared descriptives of Slovak and Czech pupils, assessed essential psychometric parameters (reliability and factor validity), and mainly performed measurement invariance and Differential Item Functioning analyses. Results: The psychometric parameters of the Slovak test form were excellent, fully comparable, or even better than the original Czech version. The mean of IRT reliability across grades was .76. However, the test differentiates mainly in above-average children. The confirmatory IRT analyses suggested clear unidimensionality and scalar invariance across the Czech and Slovak samples. However, Slovaks outperformed Czech pupils. The difference was highest in the third grade with 9.6 and 95%CI = [6.7–12.1] points at the T-score scale and lowest in the fifth grade, 3.6 with 95% CI = [0.9–6.3] points. The authors recommend the test for practical use using Czech norms. However, a user should be aware of possible differences in average performance, considering that the Czech norms could be too mild for Slovak children. Limits: Such a massive difference between Czech and Slovak populations is not plausible. The authors provided several explanations based mainly on the sampling procedure and systematic missingness in the Slovak sample, correlated to math ability. The most realistic explanation of the difference is a systematic sampling error in one or both samples. Therefore, the results are of importance for Czech users as well since it might be the case that the norms are too mild also for the Czech pupils. The authors advise Czech test users to interpret the test results with caution (and rather conservatively) until a new norming study is performed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)