Su búsqueda

Adolescence happens to gifted middle and high school students, just as it does to their nongifted peers. In fact, the adolescent period may be more prolonged among high ability youth, because their career goals may require a longer period of economic dependency during advanced schooling. How well do the conceptions of giftedness previously developed in the field of gifted education pertain to the adolescent years? Do we need conceptions of giftedness that focus specifically on adolescents? In this chapter, we provide a brief overview of the developmental tasks of adolescence. Then we review some of the conceptions of giftedness that have been developed by leaders in the field of gifted education and analyze their relevance to gifted adolescents. Finally, we offer a framework for gifted education at the secondary level that focuses on the developmental tasks facing high ability students during the adolescent period. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

Notes that gifted children and their families experience unique psychosocial stressors related to giftedness. This chapter explores preventive counseling strategies and counseling interventions for stresses related to giftedness to ensure healthy social and emotional adjustment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: create)

In this chapter, research from the last two decades concerning gifted and talented male and female adolescents is summarized, with particular attention paid to how gender, giftedness, and adolescence interact. Current research is summarized about academically talented adolescents in areas such as test differences; abilities and beliefs about abilities; the effects of stereotyping; peer, parent, and teacher influences; and career choices. Some prior conclusions are reaffirmed, present contradictory research evidence is discussed; older findings are reviewed in light of new information; questions are raised about the importance, significance, and broader applicability of prior conclusions; and future research is suggested about the interaction of gender, adolescence, and giftedness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

As with all decisions about programming or selecting curriculum for gifted students, the choices made at the secondary level should be internally consistent and consonant with beliefs about giftedness and the most appropriate goals for gifted students. While all of the program models offered at the secondary level are unique, they are all based on a belief that gifted students are unique in their learning characteristics and that the traditional or standard school curriculum as delivered in a lock-step fashion in the heterogeneous classroom is insufficient to meet the needs that arise from the distinguishing characteristics that these learners present. The ways in which the differences are defined and the suggested responses differ across models, although the models share some common attributes or assumptions that allow general categorization as either enrichment or acceleration models. This chapter discusses a variety of program models that have been developed and implemented at the secondary level. The most critical concern of all schools should be to evaluate the outcomes of the options that are offered. Current research does not clearly support any one of the available options as the best or most appropriate for the achievement of the goals we have outlined for successful education for gifted students. Clearly, differences in definitions of giftedness and beliefs about giftedness, as well as the expectations and meaning of success in any community will drive the goal-setting and evaluation processes. A clear evaluation plan that has been approved by the stakeholders in the education of gifted students will be the best test of whether or not a given set of options is successful in addressing the needs of these students. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

The purpose of this chapter is to provide an overview of the current state of the art regarding counseling gifted students. The chapter begins by giving clinicians an overview of the developmental issues facing gifted students and the typical presenting problems of this population when they seek assistance from counselors. Then counseling models that have been described in some depth in the literature are reviewed in three categories: individual, family, and group. Finally, implications for practice, training, and research are discussed. It is hoped that the chapter will serve as a rough guide for practicing clinicians and encourage university-based counselors and psychologists to initiate programmatic research to test interventions with this population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

This reprinted article originally appeared in Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 196-207. The literature focusing on mentorships and underachieving gifted young men is almost nonexistent. To address this need, the researchers examined the mentorship experiences of three students who characterized various aspects of giftedness and underachievement in males. The findings of the study revealed a single core category with three attendant subcategories. The influence of a significant adult on a a young person was the dominant category. Several related subcategories reinforced the importance of the mentor: mentors' open-minded and nonjudgmental characteristics, consistent and personalized social/emotional support and advocacy; and strength and interest-based strategies for intervention to reverse underachievement. These results underscore the critical effectiveness of mentorships on underachievement, regardless of age, environment, and socioeconomic background. Implications of the findings are presented that highlight the successful features of the mentor-protégé relationship. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

This chapter explores the relationship between delinquency and gifted children. Topics discussed include the prevalence of delinquency among gifted children and adolescents, the prevalence of giftedness among delinquent youth, possible reasons for the under-representation of gifted youth among delinquents, criminal logic, and what causes some gifted youth to be violent. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: create)

This chapter discusses whether gifted children are socially accepted and respected and how this varies with children's ages, specific school environments, and the extent of their giftedness. It also discusses what these gifted students can do to cope with their differences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

This reprinted article originally appeared in Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(4), 155-160. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 1994-19557-001.) Compared a national sample of gifted underachievers and gifted high achievers on a number of characteristics. Giftedness was measured as a composite score at or above the 95th percentile on the ACT. Underachievement was defined as reporting a high school GPA of <=2.25 (on a 4.00 scale), and high achievement was defined as reporting a GPA of >=3.75 (on a 4.00 scale). Ss were 30,604 high school juniors and seniors: 257 gifted underachievers and 30,347 gifted high achievers. The underachievers generally had lower scores on the ACT and less extensive out-of-class accomplishments. Over 90% of the underachievers were Caucasian males. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

[study was] established to gather information about the accomplishments and future plans of former PACE students a combined longitudinal and retrospective multi-case study design was employed / the longitudinal component was designed to investigate the accomplishments and future plans of secondary [school] students who had been identified as gifted in elementary school . . . and who had participated in the PACE program for at least three years / purpose of the retrospective component of the PACE follow-up study was to investigate the perceptions of 12th-grade students and their families of PACE's effectiveness in developing participating students' talent developmental perspective was introduced into the retrospective portion of the current study by asking participants to share their perceptions of both short- and long-term effects of the PACE program (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

The term twice-exceptional refers to students who have or show potential for remarkable gifts and talents in specific areas, but whose deficits and difficulties in learning, paying attention, or meeting social and emotional expectations impede their development. For too many practitioners, however, the terms deficits and giftedness are incompatible, therefore being twice-exceptional is an impossible phenomenon. In fact, many youngsters who are bright, but who have been diagnosed with some sort of disability are more likely to receive special education services than talent development opportunities. Likewise some gifted students use their talents to mask their learning difficulties and struggle in school to compensate for undiagnosed problems, thus obscuring their need for special education support. Twice-exceptional students have a unique set of academic, social, and emotional needs. The very dichotomy of abilities and disabilities that comprise their dual diagnosis sets them apart from their peers who are identified as gifted and from those who receive special education services. In fact, twice-exceptional students require dual differentiation in order to meet their often-contradictory sets of needs. This chapter discusses these unique needs and describes how developmental needs of adolescence exacerbate the issues. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

This chapter attempts to survey the scientific literature of the past few decades on the process of talent development in sports. We structure that overview around Gagné's (2003) Differentiated Model of Giftedness and Talent (DMGT). We examine separately the relevant literature associated with each of the DMGT's five causal components: (a) natural abilities or gifts, (b) the developmental process itself, (c) intrapersonal catalysts, (d) environmental catalysts, and (e) chance factors. This survey brought us to a crucial integrative question: What makes the difference between reaching and not reaching high levels of talent in sports? We had to acknowledge that there was not yet a very clear and final answer to that complex question, and that the best way to summarize the existing literature was to speak of complex interactions between the components, acting differently from one athlete to the next, and from one stage to the next in a sports career. Of what use can this chapter be to educators in schools? What suggestions can the field of sports offer to teachers of gifted and talented adolescents, and to the professionals and school administrators responsible for planning, funding, and implementing enrichment programs in the school system? Two major observations come to mind. First, it seems clear that the vast majority of trainers and coaches in sports readily recognize the large breadth of individual differences in natural physical abilities. The second observation concerns the way professionals in sports foster the talent development process. Two key concepts could summarize typical programming activities in sports: ability grouping and accelerative enrichment. Implications of these observations are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

It is easy to assume that gifted students will be successful at school, because--by definition--they learn and understand things more quickly and more easily than their age-mates do. But, school accomplishment is no guarantee; motivation plays a critical role in success. Because motivation is so complex, there are various routes to enhance or stifle it, and teachers, parents, and peers travel many of those routes. In this chapter we focus on understanding gifted students' motivation, and address what others can do to promote these students' adaptive motivation, with an emphasis on the middle- and high-school grades. We take the approach that gifted adolescents are characterized by high ability in one or more areas of human endeavor, but vary dramatically in their motivational profiles, showing patterns of motivation that range from optimal to maladaptive. This perspective allows us to consider underachieving gifted students who exhibit maladaptive motivational patterns. It is also consistent with dynamic and incremental approaches to viewing giftedness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

This chapter explores gifted students with learning disabilities as a unique population who are at special risk for social and emotional issues because of their incompatibility of extraordinary talent with significant learning problems. Topics discussed include the interaction of giftedness and learning disabilities; identification, social and emotional characteristics, and implications for the education of gifted students with learning disabilities; and educational interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: create)

This chapter highlights research findings about affective components associated with high levels of creative achievement, the environmental factors that are more likely to result in the actualization of creative giftedness, and the implications for nurturing creative talent. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

This chapter has two purposes: to provide a review of the existing research on the characteristics of families of gifted children, and to make suggestions for future research on such families from a systemic perspective. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

"Conceptual Foundations and Theoretical Lenses for the Diversity of Giftedness" / L. M. Cohen et al "Theory and Research on Curriculum Development for the Gifted" / J. VanTassel-Baska "The Schoolwide Enrichment Model" / J. S. Renzulli and S. M. Reis "Instructional Psychology and the Gifted" / H. Gruber and H. Mandl "Education and Development of Verbally Talented Students" / P. Olszewski-Kubilius and S. P. Whalen "Nurturing Talents/Gifts in Mathematics" / W. Wieczerkowski et al "Talent Development in Science and Technology" / M. C. Pyryt "Promotion of the Gifted in Vocational Training" / R. Manstetten "Giftedness: The Ultimate Instrument for Good and Evil" / A. J. Tannenbaum "New Trends in Research on Moral Development in the Gifted" / A. Pagnin and O. D. Andreani "Programs and Strategies for Nurturing Creativity" / A. J. Cropley and K. K. Urban "Developing Gifted Programs" / S. M. Moonand H. C. Rosselli "Academic Competitions and Programs Designed to Challenge the Exceptionally Talented" / J. R. Campbell et al "Evaluation as a Critical Component of Program Development and Implementation" / C. M. Callahan "Cross-cultural Studies in Gifted Education / L. Hernández de Hahn (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: book)