Su búsqueda
Resultados 6 recursos
-
Classroom teachers play an important role in the identification of gifted students through teacher recommendations and referrals. This study is an investigation of teachers' theories of giftedness using methods adapted from those used to study theory-based reasoning in categorization research. In general, the teachers in this study focused on traditional characteristics of giftedness and did not tend to include characteristics associated with diverse gifted students in their theories. Comparisons of teachers with greater and fewer hours of training in gifted education showed no significant differences between the groups. However, there was also little consistency among the teachers in their graphic representations of their theories, suggesting that not all elementary classroom teachers define common characteristics of giftedness in the same way. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)
-
Despite efforts to create alternative strategies to identify students from diverse backgrounds, there remains a disproportionately small minority representation in programs for the academically gifted. One reason for this discrepancy may be the effect of teachers' theories of giftedness on how they nominate students for gifted programming. However, very little research has been conducted on teachers' individual theories of giftedness. Inspiration for new ways of conducting research on theories of giftedness may come from research on concept and category formation from the field of cognitive psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)
-
The purpose of this study was to investigate teachers' theories of giftedness using methods adapted from those used by to study theory-based reasoning in categorization research. This study sought to answer the following questions about the reasoning behind teachers' nominations of students for gifted programs: (a) Do elementary school classroom teachers use theory-based reasoning, as described by the causal status effect in classification, when nominating students for gifted programs? (b) Is there consistency in the theories/beliefs about giftedness between and among teachers with different levels of expertise in gifted education? (c) What is the structure and content of teachers' theories/beliefs about giftedness? (d) Is there a difference in the structure and content of theories/beliefs about giftedness between teachers with varying levels of expertise in gifted education? (e) What differences exist, if any, between teachers with different levels of expertise in gifted education in the inclusion of culturally diverse characteristics of giftedness in their theories of giftedness? and (f) What differences exist, if any, between the expertise groups in their judgments of culturally diverse students? The sample was 60 elementary classroom teachers with varying degrees of expertise in gifted education. Statistical analyses as well as inductive qualitative analyses were used to answer the research questions. The teachers in this study did not demonstrate theory-based reasoning as described by the causal status effect in their judgments of hypothetical student profiles. In general, the teachers in this study focused on traditional characteristics of giftedness and did not tend to include characteristics associated with diverse gifted students in their theories of giftedness. Comparisons of teachers with greater and lesser degrees of expertise in gifted education indicated that there were no significant differences between the groups. However, there was also little consistency among the teachers in their representations of the causal links among different characteristics of giftedness in their theories, suggesting that all elementary classroom teachers do not define common characteristics of giftedness in the same way. Recommendations for further research include more focus on critical analysis of individual teachers' beliefs in course and in-services for teachers seeking expertise in gifted education, continuation of this line of research with more diverse samples of teachers, and modification to the procedures used to measure theory-based reasoning in order to better model and measure teachers' reasoning processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
-
Although the support by others of gifted and/or creative individuals has been well documented, what has been overlooked are supportive persons as creative forces in their own right, with the “object” of creation being the development of others for the greater good: engendering. No literature on engendering as a form of giftedness and creativity has been found that focuses on helping others to become great. This article addresses definitions of engendering, creativity as a social construction, issues of gender, and the tension between traditional and nontraditional models of achievement. It then explores engendering across three realms: the self as creative object; the home and family; and the greater society. It concludes with a call for defining, developing, and encouraging conceptions of giftedness and creativity that include engendering. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)
-
A discussion of all of the different conceptions of giftedness is beyond the scope of this chapter; therefore, only those conceptions for which there is evidence of use in the U.S. school system and/or those conceptions with evidence of empirical validation are described here. In addition to presenting a general overview of the influence of an individual's personal conception of giftedness, this chapter will address the terms used in the literature, particularly as these are associated with the major theorists in the field; the major questions that are addressed in research and the available empirical support for different conceptions; the limitations and the practical implications of the research; and the major references and resources for obtaining further information. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)
-
The study of the psychological constructs of cognitive ability and intelligence' has its roots in the work of theorists and researchers in the fields of psychometric measurement, intelligence, and developmental psychology. Giftedness as a trait of individuals is an outgrowth of the study of intelligence and cognitive abilities, and the definition of giftedness has changed over time as the study of human abilities has evolved in psychology. The study of giftedness in psychology can be traced back to Francis Galton's (1869) Hereditary Genius. From his observations of families of eminent persons, Galton defined giftedness as either attainment of genius or children showing the potential for genius, emphasizing the influence of heredity. Galton's beliefs about the high hereditability of intelligence and the link between measured intelligence and giftedness had a strong influence on the study of both intelligence and giftedness. This orientation continued with the work of Terman and his longitudinal study of gifted students and the work of Hollingworth (1942) with highly gifted students. Terman defined gifted children as those scoring two standard deviations above the norm on the Stanford-Binet intelligence Scale, an assessment created by Terman. Theories of giftedness that align with the conception of giftedness as advanced cognitive ability have generally focused on performance as measured by the Stanford-Binet, the Wechsler intelligence Scales, or other intelligence tests. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)
Explorar
Tipo de recurso
- Book Section (2)
- Journal Article (3)
- Thesis (1)