Su búsqueda

En autores o colaboradores
  • Despite theory and research laced with practice spanning at least a century, the identification of gifted and talented individuals continues to be a conundrum that sadly serves only to overlook many persons—particularly school-aged youth. Such oversight unfortunately often amounts to inappropriate, unnecessary, or neglectful educational accommodations, and parents who tend to look to schools for guidance for home-based interventions may very well end up feeling frustrated and puzzled as to how best rear their children. This chapter probes giftedness as it interacts with other diagnoses, particularly attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It discusses what ADHD is and is not, and how it influences individuals. ADHD in reality is a collection of three types of disorders that impact academic and social performance among children and can extend into adulthood by limiting focusing ability and task completion. The three types of disorders are: inattentive type; combined type; and hyperactive/impulsive type. Psychologists or medical doctors can use a variety of methods to aid in identification of ADHD, including clinical interviews, behavioral checklists, intelligence tests, and specific attention measures. With the current area of literature, the field of twice-exceptional work investigating giftedness and ADHD has created a solid foundation of research; however, much remains unknown. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

  • The relationships between low competency teasing, academic self-concept, and academic outcomes (i.e., GPA and academic psychological engagement) were analyzed using data from approximately 200 artistically and academically gifted students (62.2% female) recruited from two high schools. Results demonstrated two significant models for academic outcomes: the negative relationship between low academic competency teasing and GPA was mediated by academic self-concept, and the negative relationship between low academic competency teasing and academic psychological engagement was mediated by academic self-concept. When the sample was split based on giftedness domain, the mediation using GPA was significant only for academically gifted students, whereas the mediation using academic psychological engagement was significant only for artistically gifted students. All mediations were confirmed using Sobel's test (1982). Results suggest that academic self-concept is a significant variable partially mediating the effects of teasing on gifted students' academic outcomes. Furthermore, giftedness domain should be emphasized because academic outcomes may vary by domain. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Última actualización de la base de datos: 4/10/26, 6:08 (CEST)

Explorar

Tipo de recurso

Año de publicación