Su búsqueda

Comments on Sternberg's article on WICS as a model for giftedness (see record 2004-10570-002). The current author examines the reasons for the fact that complex models of giftedness seem to be en vogue at the start of this new millennium, and discusses whether the WICS model can offer new insights regarding the nature of giftedness from a cross-cultural perspective. He suggests that if Sternberg is able to theoretically and empirically confirm the three components intelligence, creativity, and wisdom not only with respect to their complementary relationships, but also regarding their different levels of complexity (with wisdom as inclusive, encompassing, and the highest level of complexity), he may accomplish-similar to the coup made by the hierarchical model of intelligence prominent in the English school during the middle of the last century-a 'Quantum leap' in giftedness research. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

Following an introductory definition of 'scientific ability and creativity', product-oriented, personality and social psychological approaches to studying scientific ability are examined with reference to competence and performance. Studies in the psychometric versus cognitive psychological paradigms are dealt with in more detail. These two research strategies complement each other in describing and explaining scientific ability and creativity in the field of science and technology. Whereas psychometric studies seem to be essential for diagnostic and prognostic purposes, cognitive psychological studies help to explain the development of individual competencies and excellent performances. In the last two decades, another research paradigm has arisen that has been characterized as 'giftedness as developing expertise'. The so-called 'expert-novice paradigm' is based on a dynamic concept of giftedness in which creativity and motivation play an indispensable role. As an example of this approach, the Munich Dynamic Ability Achievement Model (MDAAM)--an extended version of the Munich Model of Giftedness (MMG)--will be discussed in greater detail. Furthermore, empirical data from the author's studies of scientific ability and technical creativity will be presented and their theoretical context described. Finally, various possibilities for nurturing scientifically and creatively talented adolescents and adults are discussed, with sex-related problems being touched upon. Generally, the hypothetical construct 'scientific ability' can be defined as scientific thinking potential or as a special talent for excellence in (natural) sciences. Similar to this definition, 'scientific creativity' or 'technical creativity' can be conceptualized as individual and social capacities for solving complex scientific and technical problems in an innovative and productive way. Both descriptive and explanatory terms are necessary for a theoretically and practically efficient definition. This further necessitates different research strategies, which will be demonstrated with respect to several study examples. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

One of the principle reasons responsible for the fact that nurturing the gifted and talented in Germany has (once again) advanced to a pedagogic concern in the 1990's lies in the dichotomy of equality and excellence. Are these two pedagogic goals actually incompatible, as often maintained in open discussions? After a long period of oscillation between these two poles, in the age of information a new emphasis has increasingly been placed on excellence. "It becomes more and more important for bright students to be using their abilities to stimulate this new era with economic and political productivity. But this will not happen if the current 'laissez faire' approach to gifted students continues into the next decade" (Gallagher, 2000, p. 691). Following a short definition of giftedness and related conceptions, arguments for gifted education stemming from the areas of learning psychology and instructional psychology will be discussed. The central problems concerning identification and programming will then be addressed in greater detail. Hypotheses will be developed, on the basis of the ATI model that gifted students need creative, stimulating learning environments. Various approaches will be presented here and discussed in the context of TIMSS and PISA. The second part of the article will deal with guidance and counseling issues with respect to the special needs of gifted children and adolescents and their social contact persons (peers, parents, teachers). In conclusion, German program evaluation, studies in the fields of gifted education, counseling and nurturing giftedness and talent will be presented. The outcomes of these studies and their consequences for improvements for the quality of gifted and talented education and counseling in Germany will be discussed. Excellence is one of the most important educational-psychological challenges of the new century. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Comments on an article by Albert Zieglera & Shane N. Phillipson (see record 2012-16824-002). In their article, Ziegler and Phillipson criticize the “erroneous view” of the research paradigms mentioned with respect to gifted education as well as to our understanding of the development of excellence or exceptionality. Instead of them, they plead for a “paradigm shift” and describe “basic principles of gifted education” based on the “actiotope model” in a systemic view. This reminds me of the controversial debate on psychometric research approaches versus process diagnostics and “action research” in the field 25 years ago. In the first part of their article Ziegler and Phillipson review the “state of the art” and complain the deficiencies of many current fundamental principles of gifted education including talent search and identification approaches in educational and school psychology. All in all: Ziegler and Phillipson offer a very stimulating article, which provides the reader with many new insights into gifted education and useful information relevant to its improvement. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

After a brief introduction with four main questions related to identifying gifted and talented students, this article centres on the following topics: (1) multidimensional conceptions of giftedness as preconditions of suitable identification procedures, (2) functions and benefits vs. dangers of identification measures, (3) methodological problems and (4) practical recommendations for the identification of various groups of gifted and talented students. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

After a brief introduction the theoretical basis of the Munich High Ability Test-Battery (MHBT) will be outlined in the first part of the article. The MHBT has been developed in the framework of the Munich longitudinal study of giftedness and talent. The MHBT includes not only cognitive predictors measuring several dimensions and types of giftedness concerning intellectual, creative or social abilities etc., but also giftedness-relevant non-cognitive personality and social moderators measuring interests, motivations, learning emotions, self-concepts or family and school climate, educational style, quality of instruction, etc. The MHBT-instruments (different scales and dimensions) are described in greater detail. In the second part of the article, after dealing with the objectivity, the reliability, and the validity of the MHBT, the authors discuss the standardization procedure including the development of grade-based T-norms respectively as well as several talent-profiles, e.g. of gifted achievers vs. underachievers, intellectual, creative, social talents or linguistic, math, science talent profiles etc. Finally, examples of talent search for gifted programs and case studies on the basis of MHBT should illustrate multidimensional identification procedures. The MHBT fulfills the most relevant assessment tasks belonging to the gifted educational and counseling practice. The usefulness of the MHBT in the framework of giftedness research as well as of gifted program evaluation studies has also been proven in the last decade. Hence the MHBT offers many opportunities to assessing giftedness and talent. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

It is of major importance to use psychological tests and questionnaires that are carefully constructed so that their reliability and validity can be determined in different (sub)cultures (Campbell & Tirri, 2004). However, a necessary prerequisite for this is the development of solid conceptual constructs. Otherwise, the researcher runs into the danger of empirically collecting data and loosing touch with reality. A theory-free empirical approach also makes it difficult to relate findings to other psychological research. We first show why and how the Munich Dynamic Ability-Achievement Model (MDAAM) evolved from the Munich Model of Giftedness (MMG). We will then illustrate how the MDAAM can stimulate and structure theoretical and empirical research. The MDAAM can be used as an integrative model of giftedness, talent, expertise, and achievement and could this way bridge the gap between the process-oriented approaches of cognitive studies as well as expertise research and psychometric studies in the field. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Giftedness models published in the last two decades are characterized, almost without exception, by multidimensional and/or typological ability constructs. Two such examples are presented below: the Munich Model of Giftedness (MMG) and the Munich Dynamic Ability-Achievement Model (MDAAM). In the MMG, Heller and Hany (1986) and Heller (1992/2001) conceptualized giftedness or talent as a multifactorized ability construct within a network of noncognitive personality (motivations, learning emotions, control expectations, self-concepts, etc.) and social moderators as well as performance-related (criterion) variables. Diagnosis and intervention examine the difference among predictor, criterion, and moderator variables. In an attempt to forge a bridge between the psychometrically based research into giftedness and the process-oriented expertise research, Perieth (2001) extended the MMG to the MDAAM. An increase degree of expertise influences active learning processes, which in turn influence expansions of knowledge and the acquisition of domain specific competencies. This implies that noncognitive personality characteristics such as interest and task commitment or achievement motivation are to be accorded increased significance regarding talent potential. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

The aim of these studies was to gain insight into math and physics teachers' implicit personality theories (IPTs) regarding gender-specific talent and motivation. The studies used C. S. Dweck's Motivation Process model for theoretic background. The goal of Study 1 was to explore the areas in which gender-role-specific thinking existed among 70 math teachers in a German Gymnasium, as well as the extent to which it existed. Study 2 replicated Study 1, with 44 physics teachers. The teachers, as expressed by their IPTs of intelligence and learning-goal orientation, saw no gender differences. However, physics teachers awarded boys a higher performance goal orientation but seemed to assume that this was accompanied by a strong work avoidance attitude. Contrary to expectations, no relationships could be substantiated between the teachers' perceptions of pupils' motivational orientations and their reference-norm orientation, for which also no gender-specific cognitions could be proven. Sometimes gender-related points of view appeared very distinctly in both the math teacher and physics teacher samples. Sometimes though, no attitudes of this type could be isolated and, in some areas, they were detected only in contradictory statements. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

After a brief overview of recent research paradigms in the field of giftedness and talent, this chapter centers on the following main topics: 1. Multidimensional conceptions of giftedness as theoretical basis and preconditions of suitable identification procedures and educational measurements. 2. Functions and benefits versus dangers of identification measures as well as of gifted education and programming versus omission of them. 3. Methodological problems of identification, e.g., for educational programs (talent search), early identification and nurturing, dynamic assessment and nurturing at-risk groups (gifted underachievers, gifted females, etc.) or prediction of excellence in school, higher education, and work. 4. Programs and strategies for nurturing intelligence, creativity, social competence, etc., including cross-cultural studies in gifted education. 5. Counseling aspects of gifted education as tasks of school psychologists, e.g., career counseling with gifted, counseling with families (parents), school counseling programs for gifted students. 6. Practical recommendations for (school) psychologists who are responsible for identifying and nurturing gifted students. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)

The author has been a strong advocate of evidence-based approaches to gifted education and counseling for many years now, and describes in this chapter the state of affairs in Germany. He makes a compelling case for systematic program evaluation, as well as serious attention to teacher and counselor training in gifted development that every jurisdiction would do well to heed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: book)

"A Multidimensional Framework for Synthesizing Disparate Issues in Identifying, Selecting, and Serving Gifted Children" / Robert J. Sternberg and Rena F. Subotnik "The Study of Giftedness: Reflections on Where We Are and Where We Are Going / Franz J. Mönks, Kurt A. Heller and A. Harry Passow (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: book)

"Conceptions of Giftedness from a Meta-theoretical Perspective" / Albert Ziegler and Kurt A. Heller "A History of Giftedness in School and Society" / Abraham J. Tannenbaum "Giftedness as Developing Expertise" / Robert J. Sternberg "Understanding the Complex Choreography of Talent Development Through DMGT-based Analysis" / Francoys Gagné "New Conceptions and Research Approaches to Creativity: Implications of a Systems Perspective for Creativity in Education" / Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Rustin Wolfe "Giftedness in Non-academic Domains: The Case of the Visual Arts and Music" / Ellen Winner and Gail Martino "Genius and Giftedness: Same or Different?" / Dean K. Simonton "International Trends and Topics of Research on Giftedness and Talent" / Kurt A. Heller and Neville J. Schofield (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: book)

A decisive factor in the determination of effective gifted education is the fit between the individual cognitive and noncognitive (e.g., motivational and other personality) factors of the developmental and learning processes on the one hand and the environmental influences that are mainly from the social settings of family, school, and peers on the other hand. This chapter is based on multidimensional conceptions of giftedness and talent, such as the Munich Model of Giftedness (MMG), as well as on interaction models, such as the Aptitude-Treatment Interaction (ATI) by Cronbach and Snow (1977) and Corno and Snow (1986). When considering the MMG as an example of a multifactorial conception of giftedness, along with the recently developed dynamic process approach to this model (Munich Dynamic Ability-Achievement Model of Giftedness [MDAAM]), the following questions arise: How should gifted individuals be identified and instructed? And how should their learning outcomes or excellent performance be assessed? These and other questions will be answered according to the MMG and the MDAAM, respectively. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: create)

"Identification of Gifted and Talented Youth for Educational Programs" / John F. Feldhusen and Fathi A. Jarwan "Dynamic Assessment of Gifted Students" / Lannie Kanevsky "Early Identification of High Ability" / Christoph Perleth, Tanja Schatz and Frank J. Mönks "Prediction of Excellence in School, Higher Education, and Work" / Günter Trost (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: book)

"Global Professionalism and Perceptions of Teachers of the Gifted" / Alexinia Y. Baldwin, Vialle Wilma and Catherine Clarke "Families: The Essential Context for Gifts and Talents" / Joan Freeman "Identifying and Educating Poor and Under-represented Gifted Students" / James H. Borland and Lisa Wright "Counseling Gifted Students" / Nicholas Colangelo and Susan G. Assouline "Underachievement in Gifted Children and Adolescents: Theory and Practice" / Willy A. M. Peters, Helga Grager-Loidl and Patricia Supplee "Attention-deficit/hyperactivity Disorder in Gifted Students" / Felice A. Kaufmann and F. Xavier Castellanos "Gender Differences in Engineering and Physical Sciences Among the gifted: An Inorganic-Organic distinction / David Lubinski, Camilla P. Benbow and Martha J. Morelock "Guiding Gifted Girls and Young Women / Barbara Kerr "Inclusive Education for Gifted Students with Disabilities" / Carolyn Yewchuk and Judy Lupart (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: book)

"Developmental Psychology and Giftedness: Theories and Research" / Franz J. Mönks and Emanuel J. Mason "Genetic Tools for Exploring Individual Differences in Intelligence" / Lee A. Thompson and Robert Plomin "Giftedness, Expertise, and (Exceptional) Performance: A Developmental Perspective / Wolfgang Schneider "Issues in the Cognitive Development of Exceptionally and Profoundly Gifted Individuals" / Miraca U. M. Gross "Motivation and Cognition: Their Role in the Development of Giftedness" / Willy Lens and Per Rand "Social-emotional Development and the Personal Experience of Giftedness" / Laurence J. Coleman and Tracy L. Cross "A Life Span Approach to Talent Development" / Ingrid Schoon "Prodigies, Savants and Williams Syndrome: Windows into Talent and Cognition" / Martha J. Morelock and David Henry Feldman "Addressing the Most Challenging Questions in Gifted Education and Psychology: A Role Best Suited to Longitudinal Research" / Rena F. Subotnik and Karen D. Arnold "A 'Talent' for Knowledge and Judgement About Life: The Life-span Development of Wisdom" / Monisha Pasupathi and Ursula M. Staudinger (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: book)

'National/Provincial Gifted Education Policies: Present State, Future Possibilities" / R. A. Rudnitski "Changing Paradigms for Gifted Education in the United States" / J. J. Gallagher "A Study of Education for High Ability Students in Canada: Policy, Programs and Student Needs" / J. A. Leroux "Gifted Education in Europe: Programs, Practices, and Current Research" / R. S. Persson et al "Russian Gifted Education in Technical Disciplines: Tradition and Transformation" / E. L. Grigorenko "Middle-East Region: Efforts, Policies, Programs and Issues" / T. Subhi and N. Maoz "Psychological Research on and Education of Gifted and Talented Children in China" / S. Jiannong and Z. Zixiu "Programs and Practices for Identifying and Nurturing Giftedness and Talent in Asia (Outside the Mainland of China)" / W.-T. Wu et al "Programs and Practices for Identifying and Nurturing Giftedness and Talent in Australia and New Zealand" / E. J. Braggett and R. I. Moltzen "The Status of Gifted Child Education in Africa" / C. A. Taylor and S. J. Kokot "Programs and Practices for Identifying and Nurturing Giftedness and Talent in Latin American Countries" / E. M. L. Soriano de Alencar et al (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: book)

"Conceptual Foundations and Theoretical Lenses for the Diversity of Giftedness" / L. M. Cohen et al "Theory and Research on Curriculum Development for the Gifted" / J. VanTassel-Baska "The Schoolwide Enrichment Model" / J. S. Renzulli and S. M. Reis "Instructional Psychology and the Gifted" / H. Gruber and H. Mandl "Education and Development of Verbally Talented Students" / P. Olszewski-Kubilius and S. P. Whalen "Nurturing Talents/Gifts in Mathematics" / W. Wieczerkowski et al "Talent Development in Science and Technology" / M. C. Pyryt "Promotion of the Gifted in Vocational Training" / R. Manstetten "Giftedness: The Ultimate Instrument for Good and Evil" / A. J. Tannenbaum "New Trends in Research on Moral Development in the Gifted" / A. Pagnin and O. D. Andreani "Programs and Strategies for Nurturing Creativity" / A. J. Cropley and K. K. Urban "Developing Gifted Programs" / S. M. Moonand H. C. Rosselli "Academic Competitions and Programs Designed to Challenge the Exceptionally Talented" / J. R. Campbell et al "Evaluation as a Critical Component of Program Development and Implementation" / C. M. Callahan "Cross-cultural Studies in Gifted Education / L. Hernández de Hahn (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: book)