Su búsqueda
Resultados 3 recursos
-
In this chapter, I will sketch how the expert-performance approach could be extended to account for several aspects of the generation of major creative contributions in arts and science and, thus go beyond ideas in my earlier papers on genius, creativity, giftedness and organizational creativity. My chapter will start with a general overview of a few major facts about genius. Then, I will briefly describe the expert-performance approach and how this approach has proposed necessary conditions for attaining high levels of performance in many domains of expertise. I will then try to show how it might be possible to extend this model by specifying necessary conditions for making creative contributions and search tor empirical evidence for some of these ideas developed by several researchers. The fundamental issue discussed in this chapter concerns how the current work on expert performance in traditional domains, such as sport, chess, music, and ballet, might be extended to seemingly very different activities such as creative achievement in science and arts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)
-
The accusations in Gagné's (this volume) chapter are addressed and discussed. More importantly, this chapter describes the detailed differences between our two theoretical frameworks. Our theoretical framework is based on deliberate practice and focus on evidence that practice can dramatically influence the development of children, adolescents, and adults when the individuals engage in the designed practice for hours on a daily basis for months, years, and decades. In contrast, Gagné emphasizes the role of innate genetic differences and informal exercise. Once we accept the overwhelming evidence for genetic control of individual differences in height and body size, our empirical review has not uncovered rigorous scientific evidence that meets our standards and demonstrates conclusively that innate talent (gifts) are necessary for attaining expert performance. Based on the same standards, Gagné's anecdotal evidence from laypersons is rejected. The chapter concludes with an outline for how giftedness can be studied with the same rigorous scientific methods used for studying expert performance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)
-
This reprinted article originally appeared in High Ability Studies, Vol. 18, No. 1, June 2007, pp. 3-56. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2007-12554-002). Giftedness researchers have long debated whether there is empirical evidence to support a distinction between giftedness and attained level of achievement. In this paper we propose a general theoretical framework that establishes scientific criteria for acceptable evidence of superior reproducible performance, which any theory of exceptional performance must explain. We review evidence for superior reproducible performance, generally emerging only after extended periods of deliberate practice that result in subsequent physiological adaptations and complex cognitive mechanisms. We also apply this framework to examine proposed evidence for innate talents. With the exception of fixed genetic factors determining body size and height, we were unable to find evidence for innate constraints to the attainment of elite achievement for healthy individuals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)
Explorar
Tipo de recurso
- Book (1)
- Book Section (2)