Su búsqueda
Resultados 7 recursos
-
Examines 4 research designs of potential use in addressing the meaning of giftedness, including the traditional test-score-as-criterion design and 3 performance-based-research designs (academic mastery in a domain-specific area, creative productivity in domain-specific/interdisciplinary areas, and long-range creative productivity). It is suggested that the designs offer different conceptions of giftedness and imply different ways of providing educational services. (24 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
-
This reprinted chapter originally appeared in Gifted Child Quarterly, Vol 37(1), Win 1993, 23-31. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 1994-03652-001.) Studied 18 high school students (Grades 9-12) who showed creative/productive behavior in the form of first-hand investigations of self-selected topics both in and out of school. A qualitative investigation using triangulation of data methods (document analysis, questionnaires, and a student interview) and sources produced clear patterns and themes among the Ss. Data sources included family background, school environment, and a student's perceptions of his or her project development. Reflecting on experiences in their respective programs for the gifted, Ss revealed insights into the ways they obtained ideas for their projects, how their interest in their investigations was sustained, and what they learned from their efforts. As these activities continue, students gain confidence and expertise on the path to becoming creative/productive adults. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: create)
-
focused on characteristics related to the creative and productive behavior of 18 secondary school students from districts employing Renzulli's Three-Ring Conception of Giftedness / all Ss had been identified for gifted programs in their respective schools / longitudinal qualitative design included two rounds of data collection / first, when each S was still in high school, the family, the school, and the student served as data sources / second, after a three-year period, a questionnaire was distributed by mail to each student / this information pertained to school and work experiences, career plans, and recent interests and projects provides an overview of the study, a description of the longitudinal design, and an overview of Renzulli's conception of giftedness / a review of the research design, sample, data collection process, analysis procedures, and results from the first and second data collection periods follows (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)
-
This reprinted article originally appeared in Gifted Child Quarterly, 1986, Vol 30(1), 20-23. The following abstract of the original article appeared in (see record 1987-12029-001). Examines 4 research designs of potential use in addressing the meaning of giftedness, including the traditional test-score-as-criterion design and 3 performance-based-research designs (academic mastery in a domain-specific area, creative productivity in domain-specific/interdisciplinary areas, and long-range creative productivity). It is suggested that the designs offer different conceptions of giftedness and imply different ways of providing educational services. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: create)
-
The question "What makes giftedness?" has been debated for decades, with renewed interest over the past 20 years as new theories of intelligence emerged, questions of equity were raised, and resources in schools declined. To shed light on this complex and controversial question, we will draw heavily on the theoretical and research literature associated with the study of gifted and talented persons, but our approach also reflects the point of view of educational practitioners who have devoted significant time and effort to translating research and theory into defensible identification and programming practices. In this chapter, an explanation of key features to be included in a definition of giftedness is followed by a review of the types of giftedness typically identified by school personnel and a summary of purposes for educating gifted students. Subsequent discussion of the developmental nature of giftedness and a rationale for viewing giftedness as a displayed behavior rather than a possessed trait lead to an explicit definition—the Three-Ring Conception of Giftedness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)
-
The term identification, when used in an educational context, is very broad and encompasses processes that might be in place for deciding which students will be offered particular services within a school or school district, which students might be selected for a special school, or who is given the option of attending a summer Governor's School. Before any program personnel can determine who will be selected for participation, the definition of whatever construct is to be identified must be clear and agreed upon. Because of the many conceptions of giftedness found in the theoretical and research literature, the first and most important decision that should be made regarding practical procedures for identification of gifted students is to select a conception or definition of giftedness to guide decision making. Once consensus is reached on a definition of giftedness, this definition provides guidance in determining who needs to receive special services and the method one will use to select those students. The process of identification will, of course, vary considerably depending on how a school district defines giftedness. But in any identification plan, regardless of the definition chosen, a common set of questions can be used to guide how decision makers respond to the recurring and problematic questions surrounding the identification of students for special programs and services. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)
-
The Internet is generally a positive development. There are, however, serious risks to the general population. Getnetwise.org lists a number of important types of risks that are available to children. We posit that the highest risks for children are among the following: Exposure to inappropriate material, meeting dangerous strangers, harassment, power without accountability, anonymity, gender-swapping, and loss of personality. Are the gifted at any greater risk? No one knows for sure, but it is possible that some proportion of the gifted may be at greater risk than others. Who are the risky gifted? We define the risky gifted as that portion of the gifted population who may be at greater risk of danger on the Internet, possibly even as a result of their giftedness. Among the gifted who may be more at risk are those who are more curious, energetic, or imaginative. If so, they may be more exploratory, more prone to intellectual risk taking, more sensitive, and more affected by tragedy. Internet risks to children in general are now receiving mainstream attention (Jackson, von Eye, & Biocca, 2003). The particular characteristics of many gifted children invite us to speculate about curiosity or inquiry driven activity using the Internet. Let us consider several of these possible risks in more detail. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: create)
Explorar
Tipo de recurso
- Book (2)
- Book Section (4)
- Journal Article (1)
Año de publicación
-
Entre 1900 y 1999
(2)
-
Entre 1980 y 1989
(1)
- 1986 (1)
-
Entre 1990 y 1999
(1)
- 1994 (1)
-
Entre 1980 y 1989
(1)
-
Entre 2000 y 2026
(5)
- Entre 2000 y 2009 (3)
-
Entre 2010 y 2019
(2)
- 2013 (2)