Su búsqueda
Resultados 2 recursos
-
This is a letter from the editor discussing the articles in the current issue of Journal for the Education of the Gifted (JEG) . In the first article the authors proffer a metaphoric representation of the field of gifted education. In the second article, the authors investigated the effects of an affective curriculum on multiple dimensions of perfectionism among gifted students in middle school. The third article for this issue of JEG offers a study that is groundbreaking as it is the very first psychological autopsy of the suicide of a gifted female. In the fourth article, the author conducted a study in an educational setting where giftedness is not officially recognized to explore intellectually gifted students. The fifth article utilizes a qualitative research approach to investigate "the phenomenon of selective achievement by examining the experiences of two gifted university males." The final article in this issue offers a fascinating glimpse into multigenerational giftedness. It includes perceptions of giftedness across three generations of one family. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
-
The chapters in Parts 1 and 2 of this book provide considerable detail about myriad approaches to quantitative and mixed method research designs and important issues to consider when using those designs. The authors build a compelling case for the importance of using those designs in moving the research base in gifted studies toward greater sophistication. The first author’s awareness of the need to enhance the literature base by incorporating increasingly sophisticated research approaches crystallized in November 1997 at the National Association of Gifted Children conference just after a symposium on research methodology had ended, when Laurence J. Coleman, Michael Pyryt, and I stood talking about the session. I asked Michael if he thought the field of gifted studies was ready to move in a postpositivistic direction. As he was known to do, he thought about what I had asked him and carefully responded with his own question: “How can the field of gifted studies become postpositivistic when our research base is still prepositivistic?” That was Michael’s way of critiquing our field as being reliant on too many studies that were theoretically unsound and poorly conducted. The symposium had emphasized the epistemological and ontological assumptions of qualitative and quantitative approaches to research. Arguments were made during the session for the utility of both approaches, but with an emphasis being placed on the limitations of each in terms of the nature of the research questions that can and cannot be addressed by either. While few academics these days still question the usefulness of either quantitative or qualitative research (see Capraro & Thompson, 2008; Larabee, 2003), what Michael did in few words was summarize the research in the field of gifted studies circa 1997. This book is intended to be both a catalyst and a primer for future research in gifted studies to help us move from prepositivistic to positivistic and postpositivistic approaches. Michael would be pleased. In this chapter, we describe the various research approaches we have utilized over the years, including both qualitative and quantitative techniques. Other chapters in this volume have provided fodder for additional discussions about our research. As a result of the ideas generated by our fellow authors in this volume, we propose an enhancement to our existing research through the use of structural equation modeling (SEM) as described by Kline in chapter 7 of this volume. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)
Explorar
Tipo de recurso
- Book Section (1)
- Journal Article (1)