Su búsqueda

En autores o colaboradores
Tipo de recurso
  • Background: Currently, there are more cases of giftedness although it is a relatively recent term that still needs much research, as it has received different conceptions, making it difficult to reach a consensus. This work addresses the concept of giftedness from the perspective of the closest environment, specifically parents and teachers of the students. Method: Following the PRISMA methodology, a systematic review was performed, based on Web of Science and Scopus databases from 2012 to 2022. A total of 9 scientific papers were selected for analysis. Results: Both the attitudes of the teachers and those of the parents of gifted students are generally positive towards this group. However, it is a little studied subject, more research and more training on giftedness is needed in order to effectively detect and intervene with these students. Conclusions: In general, parents and teachers have a positive conception of giftedness, even though there are still many myths and stereotypes related to this group. It is necessary to investigate and train more on this subject, as knowledge has been shown to refute false myths. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

  • This study analyses Executive Functions (EF) and Creativity among neurodivergent students -including students with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Dyslexia, Intellectual Disability (ID), Giftedness-, and a group with Neurotypical development. A sample of 181 secondary school students participated in the study. Creativity was assessed by using the PIC-J test, focusing on verbal and figural components of divergent thinking, while EF were evaluated through Nesplora Ice-Cream, a virtual reality tool assessing flexibility, working memory, and inhibition. Results showed statistically significant differences in Verbal Creativity, especially in Originality: students with ADHD outperformed their Neurotypical peers, while those with ID showed the lowest scores. Although no statistically significant differences emerged in Figural Creativity, students with ADHD showed the lowest scores in Elaboration or Figural details, whereas those with Dyslexia exhibited high levels of Figural Originality, similar to their Neurotypical peers. Concerning EF, students with ID had the highest scores in Interference and Perseveration, indicating poorer Flexibility. In contrast, Gifted students performed better than the other groups in Working Memory, while students with ADHD did not exhibit special difficulties in EF. These findings emphasize the importance of personalized interventions for Neurodivergent students, that recognize and capitalize on their unique strengths while addressing specific challenges. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)

Última actualización de la base de datos: 2/10/26, 5:50 (CEST)

Explorar

Tipo de recurso

Año de publicación